This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Principle"
Leocavallari (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Chris | Chris | ||
| − | Thanks Chris - I updated the main principle page to list "Fail Securely" instead of "Fail Safely." There is a page called http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Fail_securely. MediaWiki leaves behind any pages that are renamed with a redirect to the new page, so that any old links get to the right place. [[User:Jeff Williams|Jeff Williams]] 16:09, 9 June 2008 (EDT) | + | Thanks Chris - I updated the main principle page to list "Fail Securely" |
| + | instead of "Fail Safely." There is a page called | ||
| + | http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Fail_securely. MediaWiki | ||
| + | leaves behind any pages that are renamed with a redirect | ||
| + | to the new page, so that any old links get to the right place. | ||
| + | [[User:Jeff Williams|Jeff Williams]] 16:09, 9 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Application Security Principles == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why is Principles immediately limited to Application Security Principles? Aren't other kinds of principle relevant? --[[User:RichardVeryard|RichardVeryard]] 13:51, 12 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Proven principles == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This page refers to "proven" principles. What counts as a proof - a self-appointed guru wrote it somewhere, a statistician has done a detailed meta-analysis of the literature, or what? --[[User:RichardVeryard|RichardVeryard]] 13:55, 12 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Secure Coding Principles and CLASP== | ||
| + | The Secure Coding Principles and CLASP principle duplicate principles already listed in the table of contents. Suggest they be removed from the ASDR and have the contents of the Secure Coding Page and CLASP page referenced in each the corresponding ASDR principles. --Cduffey346 20:33, 16 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:16, 16 December 2008
"Fail safely" gets redirected to a page with the heading "Fail Securely" (but still named "Fail_safely"). It seems someone thought "Fail Securely" is a better phrase for the principle than "Fail safely", but the change needs to be propagated to this page (and possibly on other pages).
I'd fix it myself but there is no page named "Fail_securely" and I don't want to make a mess of things for others -- I'm just visiting this site for the first time and don't have a feel yet for how it's being setup and maintained - I don't want to ruffle any feathers, but am trying to help...
Chris
Thanks Chris - I updated the main principle page to list "Fail Securely" instead of "Fail Safely." There is a page called http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Fail_securely. MediaWiki leaves behind any pages that are renamed with a redirect to the new page, so that any old links get to the right place. Jeff Williams 16:09, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Application Security Principles
Why is Principles immediately limited to Application Security Principles? Aren't other kinds of principle relevant? --RichardVeryard 13:51, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
Proven principles
This page refers to "proven" principles. What counts as a proof - a self-appointed guru wrote it somewhere, a statistician has done a detailed meta-analysis of the literature, or what? --RichardVeryard 13:55, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
Secure Coding Principles and CLASP
The Secure Coding Principles and CLASP principle duplicate principles already listed in the table of contents. Suggest they be removed from the ASDR and have the contents of the Secure Coding Page and CLASP page referenced in each the corresponding ASDR principles. --Cduffey346 20:33, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
