This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Top 10-2017 A9-Using Components with Known Vulnerabilities"
m (Editorial changes e.g. line feeds, added links) |
Tanyajanca (talk | contribs) m (Updated broken link to Mitre article: https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/203759/file-1100864196-pdf/docs/Contrast_-_Insecure_Libraries_2014.pdf) (Tag: Visual edit) |
||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
{{Top_10_2010:SubSubsectionExternalReferencesTemplate|year=2017|language=en}} | {{Top_10_2010:SubSubsectionExternalReferencesTemplate|year=2017|language=en}} | ||
− | * <u>[https:// | + | * <u>[https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hub/203759/file-1100864196-pdf/docs/Contrast_-_Insecure_Libraries_2014.pdf The Unfortunate Reality of Insecure Libraries]</u> |
* <u>[https://www.cvedetails.com/version-search.php MITRE Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) search]</u> | * <u>[https://www.cvedetails.com/version-search.php MITRE Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) search]</u> | ||
* <u>[https://nvd.nist.gov/ National Vulnerability Database (NVD)]</u> | * <u>[https://nvd.nist.gov/ National Vulnerability Database (NVD)]</u> | ||
Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
|language=en | |language=en | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
<!-- [[Category:OWASP Top Ten Project]] --> | <!-- [[Category:OWASP Top Ten Project]] --> |
Latest revision as of 16:30, 5 December 2018
Threat Agents / Attack Vectors | Security Weakness | Impacts | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
App Specific | Exploitability: 2 |
Prevalence: 3 |
Detectability: 2 |
Technical: 2 |
Business ? |
While it is easy to find already-written exploits for many known vulnerabilities, other vulnerabilities require concentrated effort to develop a custom exploit. |
Prevalence of this issue is very widespread. Component-heavy development patterns can lead to development teams not even understanding which components they use in their application or API, much less keeping them up to date. Some scanners such as retire.js help in detection, but determining exploitability requires additional effort. |
While some known vulnerabilities lead to only minor impacts, some of the largest breaches to date have relied on exploiting known vulnerabilities in components. Depending on the assets you are protecting, perhaps this risk should be at the top of the list. |
Is the Application Vulnerable?
You are likely vulnerable:
|
How to Prevent
There should be a patch management process in place to:
Every organization must ensure that there is an ongoing plan for monitoring, triaging, and applying updates or configuration changes for the lifetime of the application or portfolio. |
Example Attack Scenarios
Scenario #1: Components typically run with the same privileges as the application itself, so flaws in any component can result in serious impact. Such flaws can be accidental (e.g. coding error) or intentional (e.g. backdoor in component). Some example exploitable component vulnerabilities discovered are:
There are automated tools to help attackers find unpatched or misconfigured systems. For example, the Shodan IoT search engine can help you find devices that still suffer from Heartbleed vulnerability that was patched in April 2014. |
References
OWASP
External |
![CC-by-sa-3 0-88x31.png](/images/6/64/CC-by-sa-3_0-88x31.png)