This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Null Dereference"
m (Moved page into the right category. See Java space page for me details. Content has not been reviewed in this edit.) |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}''' | Last revision (mm/dd/yy): '''{{REVISIONMONTH}}/{{REVISIONDAY}}/{{REVISIONYEAR}}''' | ||
| − | + | =Description= | |
| − | The program can potentially dereference a null pointer, thereby raising a NullPointerException. | + | The program can potentially dereference a null pointer, thereby raising a NullPointerException. Null pointer errors are usually the result of one or more programmer assumptions being violated. Most null pointer issues result in general software reliability problems, but if an attacker can intentionally trigger a null pointer dereference, the attacker might be able to use the resulting exception to bypass security logic or to cause the application to reveal debugging information that will be valuable in planning subsequent attacks. |
| − | + | A null-pointer dereference takes place when a pointer with a value of NULL is used as though it pointed to a valid memory area. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | Null-pointer dereferences, while common, can generally be found and corrected in a simple way. They will always result in the crash of the process, unless exception handling (on some platforms) is invoked, and even then, little can be done to salvage the process. | |
| − | + | = Consequences = | |
* Availability: Null-pointer dereferences invariably result in the failure of the process. | * Availability: Null-pointer dereferences invariably result in the failure of the process. | ||
| − | + | = Exposure period = | |
* Requirements specification: The choice could be made to use a language that is not susceptible to these issues. | * Requirements specification: The choice could be made to use a language that is not susceptible to these issues. | ||
* Implementation: Proper sanity checks at implementation time can serve to prevent null-pointer dereferences | * Implementation: Proper sanity checks at implementation time can serve to prevent null-pointer dereferences | ||
| − | + | = Platform = | |
| − | * Languages: C, C++, Assembly | + | * Languages: C, C++, Java, Assembly |
* Platforms: All | * Platforms: All | ||
| − | + | = Examples = | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | == | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | == Example 1 == | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
In the following code, the programmer assumes that the system always has a property named "cmd" defined. If an attacker can control the program's environment so that "cmd" is not defined, the program throws a null pointer exception when it attempts to call the trim() method. | In the following code, the programmer assumes that the system always has a property named "cmd" defined. If an attacker can control the program's environment so that "cmd" is not defined, the program throws a null pointer exception when it attempts to call the trim() method. | ||
| Line 60: | Line 31: | ||
cmd = cmd.trim(); | cmd = cmd.trim(); | ||
| − | + | == Example 2 == | |
| − | Null-pointer dereference | + | Null-pointer dereference issues can occur through a number of flaws, including race conditions and simple programming omissions. While there are no complete fixes aside from contentious programming, the following steps will go a long way to ensure that null-pointer dereferences do not occur. |
Before using a pointer, ensure that it is not equal to NULL: | Before using a pointer, ensure that it is not equal to NULL: | ||
| Line 84: | Line 55: | ||
If you are working with a multi-threaded or otherwise asynchronous environment, ensure that proper locking APIs are used to lock before the if statement; and unlock when it has finished. | If you are working with a multi-threaded or otherwise asynchronous environment, ensure that proper locking APIs are used to lock before the if statement; and unlock when it has finished. | ||
| − | + | = Related [[Vulnerabilities]] = | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* [[Miscalculated null termination]] | * [[Miscalculated null termination]] | ||
* [[State synchronization error]] | * [[State synchronization error]] | ||
| − | + | = Related [[Controls]] = | |
* Requirements specification: The choice could be made to use a language that is not susceptible to these issues. | * Requirements specification: The choice could be made to use a language that is not susceptible to these issues. | ||
* Implementation: If all pointers that could have been modified are sanity-checked previous to use, nearly all null-pointer dereferences can be prevented. | * Implementation: If all pointers that could have been modified are sanity-checked previous to use, nearly all null-pointer dereferences can be prevented. | ||
| − | + | = References = | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* [http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html CWE 79]. | * [http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/79.html CWE 79]. | ||
| Line 114: | Line 71: | ||
* [http://www.link2.com Title for the link2] | * [http://www.link2.com Title for the link2] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:Code Quality Vulnerability]] | [[Category:Code Quality Vulnerability]] | ||
[[Category:Java]] | [[Category:Java]] | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Vulnerability]] | [[Category:Vulnerability]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 11:48, 10 November 2017
Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 11/10/2017
Description
The program can potentially dereference a null pointer, thereby raising a NullPointerException. Null pointer errors are usually the result of one or more programmer assumptions being violated. Most null pointer issues result in general software reliability problems, but if an attacker can intentionally trigger a null pointer dereference, the attacker might be able to use the resulting exception to bypass security logic or to cause the application to reveal debugging information that will be valuable in planning subsequent attacks.
A null-pointer dereference takes place when a pointer with a value of NULL is used as though it pointed to a valid memory area.
Null-pointer dereferences, while common, can generally be found and corrected in a simple way. They will always result in the crash of the process, unless exception handling (on some platforms) is invoked, and even then, little can be done to salvage the process.
Consequences
- Availability: Null-pointer dereferences invariably result in the failure of the process.
Exposure period
- Requirements specification: The choice could be made to use a language that is not susceptible to these issues.
- Implementation: Proper sanity checks at implementation time can serve to prevent null-pointer dereferences
Platform
- Languages: C, C++, Java, Assembly
- Platforms: All
Examples
Example 1
In the following code, the programmer assumes that the system always has a property named "cmd" defined. If an attacker can control the program's environment so that "cmd" is not defined, the program throws a null pointer exception when it attempts to call the trim() method.
String cmd = System.getProperty("cmd"); cmd = cmd.trim();
Example 2
Null-pointer dereference issues can occur through a number of flaws, including race conditions and simple programming omissions. While there are no complete fixes aside from contentious programming, the following steps will go a long way to ensure that null-pointer dereferences do not occur.
Before using a pointer, ensure that it is not equal to NULL:
if (pointer1 != NULL) {
/* make use of pointer1 */
/* ... */
}
When freeing pointers, ensure they are not set to NULL, and be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed:
if (pointer1 != NULL) {
free(pointer1);
pointer1 = NULL;
}
If you are working with a multi-threaded or otherwise asynchronous environment, ensure that proper locking APIs are used to lock before the if statement; and unlock when it has finished.
Related Vulnerabilities
Related Controls
- Requirements specification: The choice could be made to use a language that is not susceptible to these issues.
- Implementation: If all pointers that could have been modified are sanity-checked previous to use, nearly all null-pointer dereferences can be prevented.
