This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Summit 2011 Working Sessions/Session058"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template:<includeonly>{{{1}}}</includeonly><noinclude>Summit 2011 Working Sessions test tab</noinclude>
 
{{Template:<includeonly>{{{1}}}</includeonly><noinclude>Summit 2011 Working Sessions test tab</noinclude>
 +
|-
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name1 = Jason Taylor
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email1 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username1 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company1=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed1=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name2 = Justin Clarke
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email2 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username2 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company2=Gotham Digital Science
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed2=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name3 = Sherif Koussa
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email3 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username3 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company3= Software Secured
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed3=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name4 = Vishal Garg
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email4 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username4 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company4= AppSecure Labs Ltd
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed4=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name5 = Matteo Meucci
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email5 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username5 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company5= Minded Security
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed5=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name6 = Elke Roth-Mandutz
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email6 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username6 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company6= GSO-University of Applied Science
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed6=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name7 = Mateo Martinez
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email7 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username7 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company7=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed7=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name8 = Doug Wilson
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email8 = dougDOTwilsonATowaspDOTorg
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username8 = Dallendoug
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company8= [http://www.mandiant.com Mandiant]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed8= I would like to see a convergence occur, but it strikes me as a holy grail. Suggest considering that no one standard will ever work, so look at transformations and conversions amongst a small group.
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name9 = Ofer Maor
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email9 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username9 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company9=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed9=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name10 = Wojciech Dworakowski
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email10 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username10 = Wojciech Dworakowski
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company10= SecuRing
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed10=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name11 = Alexandre Miguel Aniceto
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email11 = [email protected]
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username11 = Alexandre Miguel Aniceto
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company11= Willway
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed11=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name12 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email12 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username12 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company12=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed12=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name13 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email13 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username13 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company13=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed13=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name14 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email14 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username14 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company14=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed14=
 +
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name15 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email15 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username15 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company15=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed15=
  
−
|-
+
| summit_session_attendee_name16 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email16 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username16 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company16=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed16=
 +
 
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name17 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email17 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username17 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company17=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed17=
 +
 
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name18 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email18 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username18 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company18=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed18=
 +
 
 +
| summit_session_attendee_name19 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_email19 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username19 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company19=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed19=
  
−
| summit_session_name =  
+
| summit_session_attendee_name20 =  
−
| summit_session_url =  
+
| summit_session_attendee_email20 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_username20 =
 +
| summit_session_attendee_company20=
 +
| summit_session_attendee_notes,_reason_for_participating_and_issues_to_be discussed20=
  
−
| short_working_session_description=
+
|-
 +
| summit_track_logo = [[Image:T._metrics.jpg]]
 +
| summit_ws_logo = [[Image:WS._metrics.jpg]]
 +
| summit_session_name = Counting and scoring application security defects
 +
| summit_session_url = http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session058
 +
| mailing_list =
 +
|-
 +
| short_working_session_description = One of the biggest challenges of running an application security program is assembling the vulnerability findings from disparate tools, services, and consultants in a meaningful fashion.  There are numerous standards for classifying vulnerabilities but little agreement on severity, exploitability, and/or business impact.  One consultant may subjectively rate a vulnerability as critical while another will call it moderate.  Some tools will attempt to gauge exploitability levels (which can be a black art in and of itself), others won't.  Tools use everything from CWE to the OWASP Top Ten to the WASC TC to CAPEC.  Security consultants often disregard vulnerability classification taxonomies in favor of their own "proprietary" systems.  Sophisticated organizations may create their own internal system for normalizing output, but others can't afford to undertake such an effort.  Until tool vendors and service providers can standardize on one methodology -- or maybe a couple -- for counting and scoring application defects, they are doing their customers a disservice.
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 27: Line 150:
 
|-
 
|-
  
−
| summit_session_objective_name1=  
+
| summit_session_objective_name1 = Discuss existing methods for counting and scoring defects, by vendors and practitioners willing to share their methodologies.
  
−
| summit_session_objective_name2 =  
+
| summit_session_objective_name2 = Discuss advantages and disadvantages of a standardized approach.
  
−
| summit_session_objective_name3 =  
+
| summit_session_objective_name3 = Discuss the CWSS 0.1 draft and how it might be incorporated into a standard.
  
 
| summit_session_objective_name4 =  
 
| summit_session_objective_name4 =  
Line 55: Line 178:
 
|-
 
|-
  
−
|summit_session_deliverable_name1 =  
+
|summit_session_deliverable_name1 = White paper sketching out a standard for rating risks that accomodates individual minor defects all the way through architectural flaws (that may represent many individual defects)
−
|summit_session_deliverable_url_1 =
 
  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name2 =  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name2 =  
−
|summit_session_deliverable_url_2 =
 
  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name3 =  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name3 =  
−
|summit_session_deliverable_url_3 =
 
  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name4 =  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name4 =  
−
|summit_session_deliverable_url_4 =
 
  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name5 =  
 
|summit_session_deliverable_name5 =  
−
|summit_session_deliverable_url_5 =  
+
 
 +
|summit_session_deliverable_name6 =
 +
 
 +
|summit_session_deliverable_name7 =
 +
 
 +
|summit_session_deliverable_name8 =  
  
 
|-
 
|-
  
−
| summit_session_leader_name1 =  
+
| summit_session_leader_name1 = Chris Eng
−
| summit_session_leader_email1 =  
+
| summit_session_leader_email1 = [email protected]
−
| summit_session_leader_wiki_username1 =  
+
| summit_session_leader_username1 = Chris Eng
  
−
| summit_session_leader_name2 =  
+
| summit_session_leader_name2 = Chris Wysopal
−
| summit_session_leader_email2 =  
+
| summit_session_leader_email2 = [email protected]
−
| summit_session_leader_wiki_username2 =
+
| summit_session_leader_username2 = Chris Wysopal
  
 
| summit_session_leader_name3 =  
 
| summit_session_leader_name3 =  
 
| summit_session_leader_email3 =  
 
| summit_session_leader_email3 =  
−
| summit_session_leader_wiki_username3 =
+
| summit_session_leader_username3 =
  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 88: Line 212:
 
| operational_leader_name1 =
 
| operational_leader_name1 =
 
| operational_leader_email1 =
 
| operational_leader_email1 =
−
| operational_leader_wiki_username1 =  
+
| operational_leader_username1 =  
−
 
 
−
|-
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name1 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email1 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username1 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name2 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email2 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username2 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name3 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email3 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username3 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name4 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email4 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username4 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name5 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email5 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username5 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name6 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email6 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username6 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name7 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email7 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username7 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name8 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email8 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username8 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name9 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email9 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username9 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name10 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email10 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username10 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name11 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email11 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username11 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name12 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email12 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username12 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name13 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email13 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username13 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name14 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email14 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username14 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name15 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email15 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username15 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name16 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email16 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username16 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name17 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email17 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username17=
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name18 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email18 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username18 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name19 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email19 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username19 =
 
−
 
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_name20 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_email20 =
 
−
| summit_session_attendee_wiki_username20 =
 
−
 
 
 
|-
 
|-
  

Latest revision as of 23:48, 7 February 2011

Global Summit 2011 Home Page
Global Summit 2011 Tracks

WS. metrics.jpg Counting and scoring application security defects
Please see/use the 'discussion' page for more details about this Working Session
Working Sessions Operational Rules - Please see here the general frame of rules.
WORKING SESSION IDENTIFICATION
Short Work Session Description One of the biggest challenges of running an application security program is assembling the vulnerability findings from disparate tools, services, and consultants in a meaningful fashion. There are numerous standards for classifying vulnerabilities but little agreement on severity, exploitability, and/or business impact. One consultant may subjectively rate a vulnerability as critical while another will call it moderate. Some tools will attempt to gauge exploitability levels (which can be a black art in and of itself), others won't. Tools use everything from CWE to the OWASP Top Ten to the WASC TC to CAPEC. Security consultants often disregard vulnerability classification taxonomies in favor of their own "proprietary" systems. Sophisticated organizations may create their own internal system for normalizing output, but others can't afford to undertake such an effort. Until tool vendors and service providers can standardize on one methodology -- or maybe a couple -- for counting and scoring application defects, they are doing their customers a disservice.
Related Projects (if any)


Email Contacts & Roles Chair
Chris Eng @
Chris Wysopal @
 Operational Manager
 Mailing list
Subscription Page
WORKING SESSION SPECIFICS
Objectives
  1. Discuss existing methods for counting and scoring defects, by vendors and practitioners willing to share their methodologies.
  2. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of a standardized approach.
  3. Discuss the CWSS 0.1 draft and how it might be incorporated into a standard.

Venue/Date&Time/Model Venue/Room
OWASP Global Summit Portugal 2011 		Date & Time


 Discussion Model
participants and attendees

WORKING SESSION OPERATIONAL RESOURCES
Projector, whiteboards, markers, Internet connectivity, power

WORKING SESSION ADDITIONAL DETAILS
WORKING SESSION OUTCOMES / DELIVERABLES
Proposed by Working Group Approved by OWASP Board

White paper sketching out a standard for rating risks that accomodates individual minor defects all the way through architectural flaws (that may represent many individual defects)

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

Working Session Participants

(Add you name by clicking "edit" on the tab on the upper left side of this page)

WORKING SESSION PARTICIPANTS
Name Company Notes & reason for participating, issues to be discussed/addressed
Jason Taylor @


Justin Clarke @
Gotham Digital Science
Sherif Koussa @
Software Secured
Vishal Garg @
AppSecure Labs Ltd
Matteo Meucci @
Minded Security
Elke Roth-Mandutz @
GSO-University of Applied Science
Mateo Martinez @


Doug Wilson @
Mandiant
 I would like to see a convergence occur, but it strikes me as a holy grail. Suggest considering that no one standard will ever work, so look at transformations and conversions amongst a small group.
Ofer Maor @


Wojciech Dworakowski @
SecuRing
Alexandre Miguel Aniceto @
Willway



























Retrieved from "https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session058&oldid=104328"