Difference between revisions of "Summit 2011 Working Sessions/Session058"

Revision as of 05:16, 13 January 2011

Counting and scoring application security defects
Please see/use the 'discussion' page for more details about this Working Session
Working Sessions Operational Rules - Please see here the general frame of rules.

WORKING SESSION IDENTIFICATION
Short Work Session Description	We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome. For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications.” What are the right things to measure? How can we measure them? How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk. It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little. Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance. This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion. Includes discussion of CWSS 0.1.
Related Projects (if any)
Email Contacts & Roles	Chair Chris Wysopal @ Chris Eng @	Operational Manager	Mailing list Subscription Page

WORKING SESSION SPECIFICS
Objectives
Venue/Date&Time/Model	Venue/Room OWASP Global Summit Portugal 2011	Date & Time	Discussion Model participants and attendees

WORKING SESSION OPERATIONAL RESOURCES
Projector, whiteboards, markers, Internet connectivity, power

WORKING SESSION ADDITIONAL DETAILS

WORKING SESSION OUTCOMES / DELIVERABLES
Proposed by Working Group	Approved by OWASP Board
	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.
	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.
	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.
	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.
	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.
{{{summit_session_deliverable_name6}}}	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.
{{{summit_session_deliverable_name7}}}	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.
{{{summit_session_deliverable_name8}}}	After the Board Meeting - fill in here.

(Add you name by clicking "edit" on the tab on the upper left side of this page)

WORKING SESSION PARTICIPANTS
Name	Company	Notes & reason for participating, issues to be discussed/addressed

@@ Line 107: / Line 107: @@
 | summit_session_name = Counting and scoring application security defects
 | summit_session_url = http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session058
+| mailing_list =
+|-
 | short_working_session_description= We all know that you can’t control what you can’t measure and that you need to measure the right things or you won’t be steering towards the right outcome.  For this session we will define the right outcome as “low risk to an organization from vulnerabilities in applications.” What are the right things to measure?  How can we measure them?  How can we use these application security metrics to drive towards low application risk.  It would also be great if this could be translated into monetary risk to determine if an organizations investment in applications is not too much or too little.  Some of the concepts discussed will be to take a portfolio view of application risk, assigning business risk to applications, counting defects, and measuring SDLC process performance.  This is a big unsolved problem so come prepared with ideas and be willing to take part in a discussion. Includes discussion of CWSS 0.1.