This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "User:Rick.mitchell"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
("and/or" Explanation)
("and/or" Explanation)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
'''Note''': The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.<br>
 
'''Note''': The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.<br>
Sometimes people mean "and/exclusive or" when they type "and/or" however this would look extremely strange when written and 99% of the time a simple or will suffice.
+
Sometimes people mean "and/exclusive or" when they type "and/or" however this would look extremely strange when written and 99% of the time a simple or will suffice.<br>
 
'''Therefore''' all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".
 
'''Therefore''' all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".

Revision as of 15:13, 9 June 2008

Rick's User Page

"and/or" Explanation

A quick explanation of why "and/or" shouldn't be used in written English.

Binary logic of "and" and "or"

Note: The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.
Sometimes people mean "and/exclusive or" when they type "and/or" however this would look extremely strange when written and 99% of the time a simple or will suffice.
Therefore all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".