This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "User:Rick.mitchell"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
== What Rick's Worked On ==
 
== What Rick's Worked On ==
 +
 +
Click here to see [https://www.openhub.net/accounts/kingthorin/ Rick's Contributions to OWASP ZAP.]
  
 
Click here to see [https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Rick.mitchell Rick's Contributions (Edits)]. [As of Dec. 2009 these mainly deal with the Testing Guide v3.]
 
Click here to see [https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Rick.mitchell Rick's Contributions (Edits)]. [As of Dec. 2009 these mainly deal with the Testing Guide v3.]

Revision as of 14:09, 9 September 2015

Rick's User Page

What Rick's Worked On

Click here to see Rick's Contributions to OWASP ZAP.

Click here to see Rick's Contributions (Edits). [As of Dec. 2009 these mainly deal with the Testing Guide v3.]

To see discussion and contributions with regard to the Common_OWASP_Numbering project, checkout the mailing list for Jan 2010:
OWASP Testing Mailing List Jan 2010.

"and/or" Explanation

A quick explanation of why "and/or" shouldn't be used in written English.

Binary logic of "and" and "or"

Note: The OR allows for the same True result as the AND (bottom right corner), while also allowing for other combinations producing True results.
Sometimes people mean "and/exclusive or" when they type "and/or" however this would look extremely strange when written and 99% of the time a simple or will suffice.
Therefore all written usage of "and/or" should simply be "or".