This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Template:Recommended Licenses"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (Added links to licenses, updated version number where applicable.)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<table border="1" cellpadding="3">
 
<table border="1" cellpadding="3">
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
   <td></td>
+
   <th>Artifact</th>
 
   <td colspan="4"><b>Allow commercial uses of your work?</b></td>
 
   <td colspan="4"><b>Allow commercial uses of your work?</b></td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
Line 18: Line 18:
 
   <td></td>
 
   <td></td>
 
   <td><b>Yes, no restriction except attribution</b></td>
 
   <td><b>Yes, no restriction except attribution</b></td>
   <td><b>Yes, as long as modification are also opensource</b></td>
+
   <td><b>Yes, as long as modification are also open source</b></td>
 
   <td><b>No</b></td>
 
   <td><b>No</b></td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
   <td>ToolProject<br/>(Non-WebBased)</td>
+
   <td>Tool Project<br/>(Non-WebBased)</td>
   <td rowspan="3">Apache 2.0<br/>(fewest restrictions, even allowing proprietary modifications and proprietary forks of your project, and more up-to-date than BSD license)</td>  
+
   <td rowspan="3">[https://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html Apache License] (newest version as of 2016 is 2.0):<br/>(fewest restrictions, even allowing proprietary modifications and proprietary forks of your project, and more up-to-date than BSD license)</td>
   <td>GPL 3.0<br/>(requires that modifications to your code stay open source, thus prohibiting proprietary forks of your project)</td>
+
   <td>[https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html GPL] (newest version as of 2016 is 3.0):<br/>(requires that modifications to your code stay open source, thus prohibiting proprietary forks of your project)</td>
   <td colspan="2" rowspan="4">Sorry, such licenses are not opensource and are not eligible to become an OWASP Sponsored Project. If this is really what you want, consider using CC-BY-ND or CC-BY-NC-ND. See [http://creativecommons.org/choose http://creativecommons.org/choose] for more information and note that they label these two license as &quot;not a Free Culture License&quot;</td>
+
   <td colspan="2" rowspan="4">Sorry, such licenses are not opensource and are not eligible to become an OWASP Sponsored Project. If this is really what you want, consider using CC-BY-ND or CC-BY-NC-ND. See http://creativecommons.org/choose for more information and note that they label these two license as &quot;not a Free Culture License&quot;</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
   <td>Tool Project<br/>(WebBased)</td>
 
   <td>Tool Project<br/>(WebBased)</td>
   <td>AGPL 3.0<br/>(prevents GPL's SaaS loophole)</td>
+
   <td>[https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html AGPL] (newest version as of 2016 is 3.0):<br/>(prevents GPL's SaaS loophole)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
   <td>Library Project</td>
 
   <td>Library Project</td>
   <td>LGPL 3.0<br/>(similar to GPL but modified for use with libraries that may be called by other proprietary programs)</td>
+
   <td>[https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html LGPL] (newest version as of 2016 is 3.0):<br/>(similar to GPL but modified for use with libraries that may be called by other proprietary programs)</td>
 
  </tr>
 
  </tr>
 
<tr>
 
<tr>
 
   <td>Document Project (includes E-Learning, presos, books, etc)</td>
 
   <td>Document Project (includes E-Learning, presos, books, etc)</td>
   <td>CC-BY 3.0<br/>(like Apache but for documents)</td><td>CC-BY-SA 3.0<br/>(like GPL but for documents. Alternately you can use GFDL, but projects like Debian and Ubuntu don't accept it)</td>
+
   <td>[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC-BY] (newest version as of 2016 is 4.0):<br/>(like Apache but for documents)</td>
 +
  <td>[https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ CC-BY-SA] (newest version as of 2016 is 4.0):<br/>(like GPL but for documents. Alternately you can use GFDL, but projects like Debian and Ubuntu don't accept it)</td>
 
</tr>
 
</tr>
 
</table>
 
</table>
<br/>
 

Revision as of 12:19, 19 April 2017

Why are you recommending these licenses?
Which other open source licenses are eligible for an OWASP project?

Artifact Allow commercial uses of your work?
Yes No
  Allow modifications of your work?
Yes, no restriction except attribution Yes, as long as modification are also open source No
Tool Project
(Non-WebBased)
Apache License (newest version as of 2016 is 2.0):
(fewest restrictions, even allowing proprietary modifications and proprietary forks of your project, and more up-to-date than BSD license)
GPL (newest version as of 2016 is 3.0):
(requires that modifications to your code stay open source, thus prohibiting proprietary forks of your project)
Sorry, such licenses are not opensource and are not eligible to become an OWASP Sponsored Project. If this is really what you want, consider using CC-BY-ND or CC-BY-NC-ND. See http://creativecommons.org/choose for more information and note that they label these two license as "not a Free Culture License"
Tool Project
(WebBased)
AGPL (newest version as of 2016 is 3.0):
(prevents GPL's SaaS loophole)
Library Project LGPL (newest version as of 2016 is 3.0):
(similar to GPL but modified for use with libraries that may be called by other proprietary programs)
Document Project (includes E-Learning, presos, books, etc) CC-BY (newest version as of 2016 is 4.0):
(like Apache but for documents)
CC-BY-SA (newest version as of 2016 is 4.0):
(like GPL but for documents. Alternately you can use GFDL, but projects like Debian and Ubuntu don't accept it)