This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Struts: Unvalidated Action Form"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
  #REDIRECT [[Improper Data Validation]]
 
  #REDIRECT [[Improper Data Validation]]
  
__TOC__
 
 
[[ASDR Table of Contents]]
 
  
  

Latest revision as of 23:02, 7 April 2009

Template:CandidateForDeletion

#REDIRECT Improper Data Validation


Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 04/7/2009


Description

Every Action Form must have a corresponding validation form.

If a Struts Action Form Mapping specifies a form, it must have a validation form defined under the Struts Validator. If an action form mapping does not have a validation form defined, it may be vulnerable to a number of attacks that rely on unchecked input.

Unchecked input is the root cause of some of today's worst and most common software security problems. Cross-site scripting, SQL injection, and process control vulnerabilities all stem from incomplete or absent input validation. Although J2EE applications are not generally susceptible to memory corruption attacks, if a J2EE application interfaces with native code that does not perform array bounds checking, an attacker may be able to use an input validation mistake in the J2EE application to launch a buffer overflow attack.

An action or a form may perform validation in other ways, but the Struts Validator provides an excellent way to verify that all input receives at least a basic level of checking. Without this approach, it is difficult, and often impossible, to establish with a high level of confidence that all input is validated.


Risk Factors

TBD

Examples

TBD

Related Attacks


Related Vulnerabilities

Related Controls


Related Technical Impacts


References

TBD