This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "September 16, 2014"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(Update request from Matt (IT Director))
(added agenda items)
Line 69: Line 69:
 
==New Business==
 
==New Business==
 
All active board proposals are listed [https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxSfMVkfLvslVXdvUFV3NkxucWc&usp=sharing here]
 
All active board proposals are listed [https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxSfMVkfLvslVXdvUFV3NkxucWc&usp=sharing here]
 +
* [Tobias] - Project Review committee proposal from Johanna
 +
** possibly a vote that there are no conflicts and we proceed as outlined in committee 2.0 policy.
 +
 +
* [Tobias] - Profit Share models for AppSec conferences and other OWASP events
 +
** I would like to talk about profit share for chapters from AppSec conferences and OWASP tour events and chapter days:<br>In particular about rules for "profit goal thresholds" and sharing of the profit with chapter budgets.<br>The reason for this topic is that over the last few months I received several feedback from chapters that some of the side-effects of the "rules" are confusing or do sound very unfair....<br>For that I would like to ask Paul or Laura if you could attend and provide an update on how we currently do this  - or if there is a documentation link on the wiki, it would be nice if you could send this round beforehand so people can read it before the meeting. As an alternative, I am also happy to talk with Paul off-list, but I think conferences and events are very important
 +
* [Tobias] - handling of speakers for conferences
 +
** AppSec conferences - handling of speakers: Someone has brought to my attention the following topic for discussion: <br>the question being:<br>should we allow the conference team to provide accomodation support to non-keynote speakers?<br>(the recommendation I received: "If OWASP wants the AppSec conferences to grow in size I believe that also the hotel expenses for 'normal' speakers should be covered. The current model does not attract better speakers to register as they have to cover all expenses themselves to give a talk, the current model only provides keynote speakers with accommodation. It should not only be an honour to speak at an OWASP conference, we as OWASP should actively support this knowledge sharing by stimulating speakers and meet them with their expenses and take care of the hotel for them. I am aware that in the current model the Appsec conferences are used to generate revenue for the foundation, but I believe that you have to spend money to make money: to invest into the speakers, which in turn will attract more attendees and therefore generate more income.")
 +
 +
 
* [name of person adding topic] - topic
 
* [name of person adding topic] - topic
 
** [vote needed | discussion topic]
 
** [vote needed | discussion topic]

Revision as of 21:09, 8 September 2014

Dial In Info

Notice of Recording

  • Notice to all attendees - board meetings are recorded and publicly available as of March, 2013
  • Joining the call acknowledges your awareness of recording and consent to be recorded and public dissemination of the recording.
  • [link:addme Meeting Recording]


Time

6:00pm - 9:00pm Mountain Standard Time (US)

Location

In person at AppSec USA, Denver CO - add meeting room location

Teleconference Information:

https://www3.gotomeeting.com/join/861328838

International Toll Free Calling Information


Attendance Tracker

Board Meeting Attendance Tracker

Meeting Minutes

[link:addme Meeting Minutes]

Reading Material

It is a requirement as a board member to fully read all material prior to the start of the meeting


Meeting Agenda

Call to Order /OWASP Mission

  • Administrative (List of attendees and Agenda bashing (only if last-minute changes to the agenda are needed) (5 min)

Reports

Chairmain's Report - Michael Coates

Vice Chairmain's Report - Tom Brennan

Treasurer Report - Josh Sokol

Secretary Report- Tobias Gondrom

Updated from Members at Large - Fabio Cerullo, Eoin Keary, & Jim Manico

Reports

  • Executive Director/Operations Update - [link:addme Rollup Report Sarah Baso]
  • Matt Tesauro/IT Director Update - [link:addme IT Directors Report]
    • Financial Update - [link:addme Month 2013 Financials]
    • Director Update - Kate Hartmann - [link:addme Kate Hartmann Update]
    • Project Manager Update - [link:addme Samantha Groves Project Manager Report]
    • Membership Update - [link:addme Membership Report]
    • IT Update - [link:addme Matt Tesauro Report]

Community Initiative Reports

Old Business

All active board proposals are listed here

  • add items

New Business

All active board proposals are listed here

  • [Tobias] - Project Review committee proposal from Johanna
    • possibly a vote that there are no conflicts and we proceed as outlined in committee 2.0 policy.
  • [Tobias] - Profit Share models for AppSec conferences and other OWASP events
    • I would like to talk about profit share for chapters from AppSec conferences and OWASP tour events and chapter days:
      In particular about rules for "profit goal thresholds" and sharing of the profit with chapter budgets.
      The reason for this topic is that over the last few months I received several feedback from chapters that some of the side-effects of the "rules" are confusing or do sound very unfair....
      For that I would like to ask Paul or Laura if you could attend and provide an update on how we currently do this - or if there is a documentation link on the wiki, it would be nice if you could send this round beforehand so people can read it before the meeting. As an alternative, I am also happy to talk with Paul off-list, but I think conferences and events are very important
  • [Tobias] - handling of speakers for conferences
    • AppSec conferences - handling of speakers: Someone has brought to my attention the following topic for discussion:
      the question being:
      should we allow the conference team to provide accomodation support to non-keynote speakers?
      (the recommendation I received: "If OWASP wants the AppSec conferences to grow in size I believe that also the hotel expenses for 'normal' speakers should be covered. The current model does not attract better speakers to register as they have to cover all expenses themselves to give a talk, the current model only provides keynote speakers with accommodation. It should not only be an honour to speak at an OWASP conference, we as OWASP should actively support this knowledge sharing by stimulating speakers and meet them with their expenses and take care of the hotel for them. I am aware that in the current model the Appsec conferences are used to generate revenue for the foundation, but I believe that you have to spend money to make money: to invest into the speakers, which in turn will attract more attendees and therefore generate more income.")


  • [name of person adding topic] - topic
    • [vote needed | discussion topic]


Action Items

Announcements

Adjournment

  • Next meeting date/time:



Motion to close meeting