This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Testing Guide 3.0 50 Review Second Review E"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Click here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="backgrou...)
 
 
Line 15: Line 15:
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Testing Project v3 Roadmap|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Testing Project v3 Roadmap|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
The Project is well on it's way to completion.  I read the various edits side by side with thier version 2 versions.  I see how the content changes will make the end product easier to read and understand.  The new additions, including the new attack vectors and testing methodologies, will help keep the guide current. The various new additions in the attack vectors and testing methodologies mentioned by reviewer one remain the primary uncompleted tasks. 
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
Line 20: Line 21:
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Testing Project v3 Roadmap|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Testing Project v3 Roadmap|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
Considering the progress on the reorganization (90%)  I would mark the project at 60% done.
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  |-
 
  |-
Line 25: Line 27:
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 +
It would be usful, though maybe not practical, to somehow highlight the changes made when re-editing exisiting content? Reading side by side with the version 2 in order to identify the content added or changed was very time consuming and tiring.  Also there were a couple of spelling and grammar errors I noted in passing.  Nothing big but cause for note.
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 21:13, 29 July 2008

Click here to return to the previous page.

50% REVIEW PROCESS

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Testing Project V3.0 Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

The Project is well on it's way to completion. I read the various edits side by side with thier version 2 versions. I see how the content changes will make the end product easier to read and understand. The new additions, including the new attack vectors and testing methodologies, will help keep the guide current. The various new additions in the attack vectors and testing methodologies mentioned by reviewer one remain the primary uncompleted tasks.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

Considering the progress on the reorganization (90%) I would mark the project at 60% done.

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

It would be usful, though maybe not practical, to somehow highlight the changes made when re-editing exisiting content? Reading side by side with the version 2 in order to identify the content added or changed was very time consuming and tiring. Also there were a couple of spelling and grammar errors I noted in passing. Nothing big but cause for note.