Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Testing Guide 3.0 - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"

Revision as of 18:11, 21 October 2008

Clik here to return to the previous page.

The project team accomlished all of it's tasks in a timely manner. 100% My concern was with the flow of the language as you move from section to section. This, of course, is a direct by product of different authors for different sections and thier different writing styles. In a couple of spots it made the guide a little "disjointed" in it's style. Likewise, Some authors offered detailed samples of using tools and syntax to test for the vulnerability while others offered general discriptions of how to test. As we move forward perhaps we could look at adding a detailed sample test that could address each vulnerability. Or, another code project moving forward would be to create a test checklist based on the testing guide. I think it would be of benefit to many including those new to web application pentesting. None that I know of. None I concur with Nam. A pdf document and a presentation are still needed.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I
Project Deliveries & Objectives	OWASP Testing Project V3.0 Project's Deliveries & Objectives
QUESTIONS	ANSWERS
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
PART II
Assessment Criteria	OWASP Project Assessment Criteria
QUESTIONS	ANSWERS
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
   |-
+The project team accomlished all of it's tasks in a timely manner.
   | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 . At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Testing Project v3 Roadmap|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
   |-
+%
   | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 . Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
   |-
+My concern was with the flow of the language as you move from section to section. This, of course, is a direct by product of different authors for different sections and thier different writing styles.  In a couple  of spots it made the guide a little  "disjointed" in it's style. Likewise, Some authors offered detailed samples of using tools and syntax to test for the vulnerability while others offered general discriptions of how to test.  As we move forward perhaps we could look at adding a detailed sample test that could address each vulnerability.
+Or, another code project moving forward would be to create a test checklist based on the testing guide.  I think it would be of benefit to many including those new to web application pentesting.
   | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"|
@@ Line 42: / Line 46: @@
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
   |-
+None that I know of.
   | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 . Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
   |-
+None
   | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 . Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
   |-
+I concur with Nam.  A pdf document and a presentation are still needed.
   | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 . Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
   | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 |}

Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Testing Guide 3.0 - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"

Revision as of 18:11, 21 October 2008

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Reference

Tools