This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Source Code Review OWASP Projects - Final Review - First Reviewer - D"
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
− | + | More OWASP project leaders need to integrate security into the Software Life Cycle. A "lead with a tool" approach, using a static analysis tool, is a good way to start. This type of approach also enhances other complementary software assurance activities, e.g., bug tracking and testing. Participation and feedback from these efforts will help inform this process and make it an integral part of the OWASP SDL. | |
|} | |} |
Revision as of 18:47, 1 November 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
OWASP Source Code Review OWASP-Projects Project's Deliveries & Objectives | |
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
The major project objectives have been accomplished:
| |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
| |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
N/A | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
All Alpha criteria are fulfilled. | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
The project leads state that documentation needs to be expanded and links added to the code review guide. | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
The project leads intend to add the OWASP EU Summit presentation to fulfill that requirement once it's ready. | |
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
More OWASP project leaders need to integrate security into the Software Life Cycle. A "lead with a tool" approach, using a static analysis tool, is a good way to start. This type of approach also enhances other complementary software assurance activities, e.g., bug tracking and testing. Participation and feedback from these efforts will help inform this process and make it an integral part of the OWASP SDL. |