This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template SKAVENGER - Final Review - First Reviewer - D"
From OWASP
RoganDawes (talk | contribs) (completion) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Project Information:template SKAVENGER| | + | [[Project Information:template SKAVENGER|Click here to return to the previous page]]. |
{| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" | {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Skavenger|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Skavenger|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- From my assessment of Skavenger, all project objectives have been met. |
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Skavenger|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | 2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Skavenger|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- 100% |
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- It seems that the majority (all?) of proxies targeted by Skavenger are Java based. Consequently, it would make sense to reimplement the Skavenger core in Java to facilitate integration with the targeted proxies. |
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"| | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- None |
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- None |
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | |- | + | |- None |
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 11:34, 27 February 2009
Click here to return to the previous page.
| FINAL REVIEW | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||
|
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
||
|
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
||
|
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
||
| PART II | ||
|
Assessment Criteria |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
||
|
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
||
|
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
||
|
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
||
