This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Orizon Project - Final Review - First Reviewer - D"
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|it has reached alpha status |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|It has reached beata quality given that it works and also there is some documentation relating to using the tool. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Full documentation is required and also a stable baseline source code. The overall engine is in good shape but for the tool to gain widespread adoption it needs to be made more user friendly. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| A "quick start" guide on how to use to tool is very important going foreward. |
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 11:43, 14 November 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
I believe 70% has been reached. The project is very ambitious and considering the amount of work done I am very happy with the progress made. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
70% | |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Focus on useability for example GUI and other methods for eae of use. Adoption is key for any tool to grow and gain "market share". | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
it has reached alpha status | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
It has reached beata quality given that it works and also there is some documentation relating to using the tool. | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
Full documentation is required and also a stable baseline source code. The overall engine is in good shape but for the tool to gain widespread adoption it needs to be made more user friendly. | |
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
A "quick start" guide on how to use to tool is very important going foreward. |