This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Project Information:template Internationalization Guidelines - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F

From OWASP
Revision as of 17:36, 5 September 2008 by Rodrigo (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Internationalization Guidelines Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

  1. Team up with Larry Casey to implement Multi language support in OWASP.org Mediawiki. - Completed.
  2. General Guidelines on minimum/recommended requirements to start a new language translation for OWASP Document and Site Pages. - Completed.
  3. General Guidelines on minimum/recommended requirements to implement internationalization and localization (i18n) on OWASP Software. - Completed
  4. Create a Communication strategy to help and keep track on new pages or changes in significant pages so all the translations are in sync. - Completed

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

  1. - 100%
  2. - 100%
  3. - 100%
  4. - 100%

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

The work had been completed perfectly.

PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

None.

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

None.

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

All criteria has been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status.

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.