This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template GTK plus GUI for w3af Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"
m (typo corrected) |
m (typo corrected) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
| − | Advices go to the users to use the tool and make enhancement request (if any). Andres and Facundo are very responsive and most likely implement | + | Advices go to the users to use the tool and make enhancement request (if any). Andres and Facundo are very responsive and most likely implement useful improvements right away. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | ||
Latest revision as of 22:16, 28 October 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
| FINAL REVIEW | ||
|---|---|---|
| PART I | ||
|
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
The project is fully completed within the time schedule. The progress of development, bugfixes and implementing (new) enhancements can be found at w3af sourceforge project page here, and the details here. According the description in the assumed ones I'm missing a proper documentation. With "proper" I mean that the tool comes with good online documention and a separate PDF file. But both seem to be slightly outdated, and the version to be found at the w3af sourceforge project page is outdated too. | |
|
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
The project is completed 100% (if we do not count the missing final update of the documentation:). Well done! | |
|
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Advices go to the users to use the tool and make enhancement request (if any). Andres and Facundo are very responsive and most likely implement useful improvements right away. | |
| PART II | ||
|
Assessment Criteria |
||
| QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
|
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
All criterias are satisfied. | |
|
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
All criterias are satisfied. According the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology Beta Quality OWASP Tools the "About Box" misses the release date. | |
|
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
||
|
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
||
