This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Project Information:template EnDe - First Review - Self Evaluation - A

From OWASP
Revision as of 14:45, 23 June 2008 by Achim (talk | contribs) (inital inquiery completed)

Jump to: navigation, search

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

EnDe Project RoadMap & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

The current version is stable (beside some known browser GUI quirks). There're improvements planed like adding more hashing, coding and encryption functions, see EnDe RoadMap for details. This new functionality should be considered as enhancement request.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

As the above listed encryption functions are more difficult to implement than those already there, I'd calculate the project at 75%.

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

1. Reviewer

  • anything to be found at the OWASP wiki
  • the documentation, see [?] button in the GUI and EnDe.man.txt

2. Community

  • initial code for the missing features (see EnDe RoadMap)
  • testing and reporting bugs and enhancement requests
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?