This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Review Project - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="backgro...) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|I believe I have reached 100% of my objectives but there is much more work to do (it is only V1.1). I would like to base V2.0 on the ASVS Guide criterion. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | 2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Everything has been done apart from ESAPI as that is a guide in its own right. Again I need to flesh out portions of the guide to complement the ASVS standard. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? | 3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| For Version 2.0 I need more contributors. The CRG needs to integrate better with other guides and other guides integrate more with CRG. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| N/A |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|N/A |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? | 4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None, Jeff gave it a good going over. Feedback for the most part is very positive. |
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 17:25, 3 December 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
OWASP Code Review Guide V1.1 Project's Deliveries & Objectives | |
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
I believe I have reached 100% of my objectives but there is much more work to do (it is only V1.1). I would like to base V2.0 on the ASVS Guide criterion. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
Everything has been done apart from ESAPI as that is a guide in its own right. Again I need to flesh out portions of the guide to complement the ASVS standard. | |
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
For Version 2.0 I need more contributors. The CRG needs to integrate better with other guides and other guides integrate more with CRG. | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
N/A | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
N/A | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
None | |
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
None, Jeff gave it a good going over. Feedback for the most part is very positive. |