This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Review Project - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="backgro...)
 
 
Line 17: Line 17:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
 
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|I believe I have reached 100% of my objectives but there is much more work to do (it is only V1.1). I would like to base V2.0 on the ASVS Guide criterion.
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
 
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Everything has been done apart from ESAPI as that is a guide in its own right. Again I need to flesh out portions of the guide to complement the ASVS standard.
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
 
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| For Version 2.0 I need more contributors. The CRG needs to integrate better with other guides and other guides integrate more with CRG.
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
Line 40: Line 40:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
 
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| N/A
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
 
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|N/A
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
 
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None
 
  |-   
 
  |-   
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
 
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None, Jeff gave it a good going over. Feedback for the most part is very positive.
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 17:25, 3 December 2008

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Code Review Guide V1.1 Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

I believe I have reached 100% of my objectives but there is much more work to do (it is only V1.1). I would like to base V2.0 on the ASVS Guide criterion.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

Everything has been done apart from ESAPI as that is a guide in its own right. Again I need to flesh out portions of the guide to complement the ASVS standard.

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

For Version 2.0 I need more contributors. The CRG needs to integrate better with other guides and other guides integrate more with CRG.
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

N/A

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

N/A

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

None

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

None, Jeff gave it a good going over. Feedback for the most part is very positive.