This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Review Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"
Satishkumar (talk | contribs) |
Satishkumar (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|This guide is a crucial part of any code reviewers toolkit. The author has done | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|This guide is a crucial part of any code reviewers toolkit. The author has done excellently in providing a guide that enables a reviewer to know what to look for in a code review and thus, improve security at the earliest in an application. I hope the author continues to give us future editions of this guide while keeping it relevant to newer security threats. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' |
Revision as of 16:53, 3 December 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
OWASP Code Review Guide V1.1 Project's Deliveries & Objectives | |
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
1) The guide has accomplished its desired objectives and deliverables. 2) The changes and enhancements made since the 50% review have smoothly integrated into the guide overall. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
100% | |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
This guide is a crucial part of any code reviewers toolkit. The author has done excellently in providing a guide that enables a reviewer to know what to look for in a code review and thus, improve security at the earliest in an application. I hope the author continues to give us future editions of this guide while keeping it relevant to newer security threats. | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
||
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
||
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |