This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Review Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
 
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|This guide is a crucial part of any code reviewers toolkit. The author has done an excellently in providing a guide that enables a reviewer to know what to look for in a code review and thus, improve security at the earliest in an application. I hope the author continues to give us future editions of this guide while keeping it relevant to newer security threats.
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|This guide is a crucial part of any code reviewers toolkit. The author has done excellently in providing a guide that enables a reviewer to know what to look for in a code review and thus, improve security at the earliest in an application. I hope the author continues to give us future editions of this guide while keeping it relevant to newer security threats.
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  

Revision as of 16:53, 3 December 2008

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Code Review Guide V1.1 Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.


1) The guide has accomplished its desired objectives and deliverables.
2) The changes and enhancements made since the 50% review have smoothly integrated into the guide overall.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

100%

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

This guide is a crucial part of any code reviewers toolkit. The author has done excellently in providing a guide that enables a reviewer to know what to look for in a code review and thus, improve security at the earliest in an application. I hope the author continues to give us future editions of this guide while keeping it relevant to newer security threats.
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.