This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Crawler - Final Review - Self Evaluation - B"
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? | 3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| Help could be helpful in improving the content of Code Crawler Database. Doing so will improve the accuracy of the engine and consequently the value of the tool |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' |
Revision as of 12:57, 22 February 2009
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
The application is easy to use and setup. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
Stable (100%) | |
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |
Help could be helpful in improving the content of Code Crawler Database. Doing so will improve the accuracy of the engine and consequently the value of the tool | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
||
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
||
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
||
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community? |