This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Crawler - Final Review - First Reviewer - D"
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| |- |
− | |||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None, The project is sure beta quality. Its easy to use, configure and install.Only thing would be documentation and cross reference from code review, testing and development guides would be a good idea. |
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| |
Revision as of 15:26, 16 March 2009
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PART I | |||||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
|||||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | ||||
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
All targets have been met to the most degree. The tool is intuitive and easy to install and setup. It is a giant step in the right direction. | ||||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
100% | ||||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Support for PHP, the most widely used web language. | ||||
PART II | |||||
Assessment Criteria |
|||||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | ||||
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
|- |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
None, The project is sure beta quality. Its easy to use, configure and install.Only thing would be documentation and cross reference from code review, testing and development guides would be a good idea. | ||
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
N/A | ||||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |