This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Project Information:template Classic ASP Security Project 50 Review Second Review E

From OWASP
Revision as of 03:05, 28 July 2008 by Aandreu (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Click here to return to the previous page.

50% REVIEW PROCESS

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Classic ASP Security Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

Creation of a Common Object Repository - progress on this front is evident even though the task is not complete as of yet. A current estimate of the progress is presented in section 2 below
Create Documentation - complete
Addition of expression for Code Review Tool to support Classic ASP applications - complete
Implementation of Version 1 of Stinger for ASP either by using an installable COM library or ISAPI - not complete yet even though evidence of a compiled DLL has been provided by the developer, so there is some movement on this front
This same module will compliment the OWASP Validation Documentation Project - not complete yet

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

Creation of a Common Object Repository - 50% - 60%
Create Documentation - 100%
Addition of expression for Code Review Tool to support Classic ASP applications - 100%
Implementation of Version 1 of Stinger for ASP either by using an installable COM library or ISAPI - 0%
This same module will compliment the OWASP Validation Documentation Project - 0%

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

The progress on this project is positive and developments look on track towards completion. The only suggestion would be to maintain the current momentum.