This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Backend Security Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="ba...) |
|||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OWASP Backend Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OWASP Backend Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | The goals of the project have been met with the delivered content. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OWASP Backend Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | 2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#OWASP Backend Security Project|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | 100% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | The overall content is great. I think that the wiki and the pdf could use more formatting. With the Content section of the wiki it would be nice to have a link to each subsection. This is mainly because as the document grows it will become required for easy navigation. The PDF needs two things. The first is a clickable index like in documents created with PDF writer. The second is code boxing. This is where people put boxes/outlines around code which makes it easier to read. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | ||
Line 41: | Line 44: | ||
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | All Alpha quality criteria have been met except for the mailing list. This may be in place and I am just unaware of it. If this is so, then there should be a link on the project page for people to join so that they are also aware that they can get updates on the project. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | This document meets the Beta Quality criteria | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | This project does not meet Release quality standards set forth by OWASP. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
+ | Great job on the project. It has very good interlinking to other OWASP documents which makes research easy. | ||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 15:33, 10 December 2008
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
The goals of the project have been met with the delivered content. | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
100% | |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
The overall content is great. I think that the wiki and the pdf could use more formatting. With the Content section of the wiki it would be nice to have a link to each subsection. This is mainly because as the document grows it will become required for easy navigation. The PDF needs two things. The first is a clickable index like in documents created with PDF writer. The second is code boxing. This is where people put boxes/outlines around code which makes it easier to read. | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
All Alpha quality criteria have been met except for the mailing list. This may be in place and I am just unaware of it. If this is so, then there should be a link on the project page for people to join so that they are also aware that they can get updates on the project. | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
This document meets the Beta Quality criteria | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
This project does not meet Release quality standards set forth by OWASP. | |
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Great job on the project. It has very good interlinking to other OWASP documents which makes research easy. |