This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Project Information:template Backend Security Project - Final Review - First Reviewer - D

From OWASP
Revision as of 09:36, 5 November 2008 by Kisero (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Backend Security Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

All the project's goals have been completed and formatted in a PDF document.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

All the goals have been accomplished, a quick sumup is: all DB engines (including db2 and oracle) and ldap. All this is covered in the three coding languages pre-defined: php, .net and java.

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

Discussed with Carlo about re-formating the index of the document for easy reading. The project output is a 180 pages document and takes some time to go trough it.
PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

OWASP License (TBC), Project has been documented on the OWASP Website, Code in Googlecode / SourceForge (TBC if it's on this systems. The code (example code is provided) can be found on the PDF), Mailing list (done), Sovles a Core application security...of course!

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

As per the author, all has been achieved.

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

Not needed at for this project.

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

Discussed with Carlo about reformating the doument and maybe use an alternative filetype than PDF for easy reading (altough on the owasp project website you can find the html).