This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Project Information:template .NET Project - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I

Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP .NET Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

The project has produced valueable resources for secure .NET development and security awareness.

It needs a press release to create awareness. - I agree with these statements and that it needs to be looked after so it does not go out of date. Also, I agree that this information can get "stale" relatively quickly but at this time I am not sure how to accomplish this without assigning to an individual. I think is was overdue and glad that the project has been successful at creating a useful structure for aggregating data into a single source on the OWASP site.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage.

100%

3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

As mentioned such an informational project needs constant care and attention. It also needs a team behind it. - agree

I look forward to seeing this project expand to include future releases of development environments such as Silverlight.

PART II

Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

Yes

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

Yes

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

Yes. Section "Areas of Concern" seems to need some work? https://www.owasp.org/index.php/.NET_Security_for_Developers - agree

4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions.

Would like to see going forward integration with the other OWASP guides; Code review, Development etc - agree and It would be nice to have a consistent presentation of the information as well|