This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "OWASP Wapiti Project - Assessment Frame - First Review - Self Evaluation - A"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: Clik here to return to the previous page. {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" ! colspan="3" align="center" style="backgro...)
 
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Project Information:template Code Review Project|Clik here to return to the previous page]].
+
[[OWASP Wapiti Project - Assessment Frame|Clik here to return to the previous page]].
  
 
{| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center"
 
{| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center"
Line 7: Line 7:
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"|
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
+
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| Project Deliveries & Objectives   
Project Deliveries & Objectives   
 
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
[[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|OWASP Code Review Guide V1.1 Project's Deliveries & Objectives]]
+
[http://www.ict-romulus.eu/web/wapiti/roadmap OWASP Wapiti Project's Deliveries & Objectives]
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#4058A0" align="center"|<font color="white">'''QUESTIONS'''  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#4058A0" align="center"|<font color="white">'''QUESTIONS'''  
Line 16: Line 15:
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
+
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration the assumed ones [http://www.ict-romulus.eu/web/wapiti/roadmap <font color="white">(see here)], <font color="black"> please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|I believe I have reached 100% of my objectives but there is much more work to do (it is only V1.1). I would like to base V2.0 on the ASVS Guide criterion.
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications#OWASP Code review guide, V1.1|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage.
+
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished?  Having in consideration the assumed ones [http://www.ict-romulus.eu/web/wapiti/roadmap <font color="white">(see here)], <font color="black"> please quantify in terms of percentage.
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Everything has been done apart from ESAPI as that is a guide in its own right. Again I need to flesh out portions of the guide to complement the ASVS standard.
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
+
3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| For Version 2.0 I need more contributors. The CRG needs to integrate better with other guides and other guides integrate more with CRG.
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|  
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II'''  
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:white" align="left"|
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
+
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|Assessment Criteria
Assessment Criteria
 
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
[[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Criteria]]
 
[[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Criteria]]
Line 39: Line 37:
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
+
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology [[:Category:OWASP_Project_Assessment#Alpha_Quality_Tool_Criteria|<font color="white">(see here)]] <font color="black">, which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| N/A
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|  
 
  |-
 
  |-
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
+
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology [[:Category:OWASP_Project_Assessment#Beta_Quality_Tool_Criteria|<font color="white">(see here)]] <font color="black">, which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|N/A
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  |-  
 
  |-  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|  
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
+
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology [[:Category:OWASP_Project_Assessment#Release_Quality_Tool_Criteria|<font color="white">(see here)]] <font color="black">, which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
  |-   
 
  |-   
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
 
  | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"|
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
+
4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None, Jeff gave it a good going over. Feedback for the most part is very positive.
+
  | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 14:31, 16 January 2009

Clik here to return to the previous page.

FINAL REVIEW
PART I
Project Deliveries & Objectives

OWASP Wapiti Project's Deliveries & Objectives

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones (see here), please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised.

2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones (see here), please quantify in terms of percentage.

3. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?

PART II
Assessment Criteria

OWASP Project Assessment Criteria

QUESTIONS ANSWERS

1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology (see here) , which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status?

2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology (see here) , which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status?

3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology (see here) , which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status?

4. What kind of help is required either from the Reviewers or from the OWASP Community?