This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "OWASP Wapiti Project - Assessment Frame - First Review - First Reviewer - B"
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
− | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [http://www.ict-romulus.eu/web/wapiti the assumed ones], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | + | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [http://www.ict-romulus.eu/web/wapiti <font color="white"> the assumed ones], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
| colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 17:50, 9 January 2009
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives | ||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
||
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria | ||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
||
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
||
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |