This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "OWASP Autumn of Code 2006 - Selection"
From OWASP
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) |
Dinis.cruz (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Jury: These results have analysed and classified by Andrew van der Stock, Jeff Williams and Dinis Cruz. | Jury: These results have analysed and classified by Andrew van der Stock, Jeff Williams and Dinis Cruz. | ||
− | |||
== Selection Criteria == | == Selection Criteria == | ||
Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
* On the Project: | * On the Project: | ||
− | ** | + | ** Complete status - What will be the final Completeness State? |
− | ** | + | ** Complexity - What is the project Complexity and its Size |
− | ** Value to Owasp Members | + | ** Member Value - How big is the potential added value to Owasp Members |
− | ** Value to Owasp Brand | + | ** Brand Value - How big is the potential added value to the Owasp Brand |
* On the Candidate: | * On the Candidate: | ||
− | ** Value of past | + | ** Past Work - Value of past contributions to OWASP Projects |
− | ** Proven capability to deliver | + | ** Deliverably - Proven capability to deliver |
− | ** | + | ** Proposal - What was the quality of proposal submited? |
+ | |||
+ | == Classication of Proposals == | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| border="1" | ||
+ | |+ OWASP Autumn of Code 2006 Results | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Proposal || Andrew v. Stock|| Jeff Williams || Dinis Cruz || .. || Total | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |Proposal || Complete State || Complexity || Member Value || Brand Value || Past Work || Deliverably || Proposal || .. || Total | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |||
+ | | 1 AoC 1 - Paolo || 0 || 0 || 0 || .. || 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 2 AoC 2 - Federico || 0 || 0 || 0 || .. || 0 | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | 3 AoC 3 - Tom || 0 || 0 || 0 || .. || 0 | ||
+ | |} |
Revision as of 23:54, 21 September 2006
This page contains the Selection Criteria used to select the projects sponsored on the OWASP Autumn of Code 2006 and the final classification.
Jury: These results have analysed and classified by Andrew van der Stock, Jeff Williams and Dinis Cruz.
Selection Criteria
Each project will receive a rating from 1 to 5 on the following categories by each jury. The final result will be the medium value.
- On the Project:
- Complete status - What will be the final Completeness State?
- Complexity - What is the project Complexity and its Size
- Member Value - How big is the potential added value to Owasp Members
- Brand Value - How big is the potential added value to the Owasp Brand
- On the Candidate:
- Past Work - Value of past contributions to OWASP Projects
- Deliverably - Proven capability to deliver
- Proposal - What was the quality of proposal submited?
Classication of Proposals
Proposal | Andrew v. Stock | Jeff Williams | Dinis Cruz | .. | Total | ||||
Proposal | Complete State | Complexity | Member Value | Brand Value | Past Work | Deliverably | Proposal | .. | Total |
1 AoC 1 - Paolo | 0 | 0 | 0 | .. | 0 | ||||
2 AoC 2 - Federico | 0 | 0 | 0 | .. | 0 | ||||
3 AoC 3 - Tom | 0 | 0 | 0 | .. | 0 |