This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Germany/Projekte/Top 10-2013-A2-Fehler in Authentisierung und Session-Management

From OWASP
Revision as of 22:26, 15 June 2013 by T.Gigler (talk | contribs) (Top_10_2010:SummaryTableHeaderBeginTemplate|type=images => mit Bildern)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

NOTE: THIS IS NOT THE LATEST VERSION. Please visit the OWASP Top 10 project page to find the latest edition.

← A1-Injection
2013 Inhaltsverzeichnis

2013 Die Top-10-Risiken

A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) →
Bedrohungsquellen
Angriffsvektoren
Schwachstellen
Technische Auswirkung
Auswirkung auf das Unternehmen
Anwendungs-
spezifisch
Ausnutzbarkeit
DURCHSCHNITTLICH
Verbreitung
SEHR HÄUFIG
Auffindbarkeit
DURCHSCHNITTLICH
Auswirkung
SCHWERWIEGEND
Application / Business Specific

Consider anonymous external attackers, as well as users with their own accounts, who may attempt to steal accounts from others. Also consider insiders wanting to disguise their actions.

Attacker uses leaks or flaws in the authentication or session management functions (e.g., exposed accounts, passwords, session IDs) to impersonate users.

Developers frequently build custom authentication and session management schemes, but building these correctly is hard. As a result, these custom schemes frequently have flaws in areas such as logout, password management, timeouts, remember me, secret question, account update, etc. Finding such flaws can sometimes be difficult, as each implementation is unique.

Such flaws may allow some or even all accounts to be attacked. Once successful, the attacker can do anything the victim could do. Privileged accounts are frequently targeted.

Consider the business value of the affected data or application functions.

Also consider the business impact of public exposure of the vulnerability.

Bin ich durch 'Fehler in Authentifizierung und Session-Management' verwundbar?

Are session management assets like user credentials and session IDs properly protected? You may be vulnerable if:

  1. User authentication credentials aren’t protected when stored using hashing or encryption. See A6.
  2. Credentials can be guessed or overwritten through weak account management functions (e.g., account creation, change password, recover password, weak session IDs).
  3. Session IDs are exposed in the URL (e.g., URL rewriting).
  4. Session IDs are vulnerable to session fixation attacks.
  5. Session IDs don’t timeout, or user sessions or authentication tokens, particularly single sign-on (SSO) tokens, aren’t properly invalidated during logout.
  6. Session IDs aren’t rotated after successful login.
  7. Passwords, session IDs, and other credentials are sent over unencrypted connections. See A6.

See the ASVS requirement areas V2 and V3 for more details.


Wie kann ich 'Fehler in Authentifizierung und Session-Management' verhindern?

The primary recommendation for an organization is to make available to developers:

  1. A single set of strong authentication and session management controls. Such controls should strive to:
    1. meet all the authentication and session management requirements defined in OWASP’s Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) areas V2 (Authentication) and V3 (Session Management).
    2. have a simple interface for developers. Consider the ESAPI Authenticator and User APIs as good examples to emulate, use, or build upon.
  2. Strong efforts should also be made to avoid XSS flaws which can be used to steal session IDs. See A3.
Mögliche Angriffsszenarien

Scenario #1: Airline reservations application supports URL rewriting, putting session IDs in the URL:

http://example.com/sale/saleitems
jsessionid=2P0OC2JSNDLPSKHCJUN2JV

?dest=Hawaii

An authenticated user of the site wants to let his friends know about the sale. He e-mails the above link without knowing he is also giving away his session ID. When his friends use the link they will use his session and credit card.

Scenario #2: Application’s timeouts aren’t set properly. User uses a public computer to access site. Instead of selecting “logout” the user simply closes the browser tab and walks away. Attacker uses the same browser an hour later, and that browser is still authenticated.

Scenario #3: Insider or external attacker gains access to the system’s password database. User passwords are not properly hashed, exposing every users’ password to the attacker.

Referenzen

OWASP For a more complete set of requirements and problems to avoid in this area, see the ASVS requirements areas for Authentication (V2) and Session Management (V3).

Andere

← A1-Injection
2013 Inhaltsverzeichnis

2013 Die Top-10-Risiken

A3-Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) →

© 2002-2013 OWASP Foundation This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license. Some rights reserved. CC-by-sa-3 0-88x31.png