This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "GPTC Agenda 20 Jan 2009"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Agenda for Global Projects & Tools Committee on 20 Jan 2009)
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
 
** Can the reviewers role definition be improved? Shouldn't it be linked to the assessment criteria? How?
 
** Can the reviewers role definition be improved? Shouldn't it be linked to the assessment criteria? How?
 
*** http://owaspsoc2008.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/assessment-guidance/
 
*** http://owaspsoc2008.wordpress.com/2008/07/15/assessment-guidance/
** Can a set of criterion be established to define OWASP priorities in terms of projects available to be sponsored by our OWASP Members?
+
 
 
** We need to set up as as possible a new season of code. How will it be done?
 
** We need to set up as as possible a new season of code. How will it be done?
 
** New projects waiting for Committee's response:
 
** New projects waiting for Committee's response:
Line 26: Line 26:
 
* Closure of Summer Of Code 2008 http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Summer_of_Code_2008
 
* Closure of Summer Of Code 2008 http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Summer_of_Code_2008
 
* Boaz Gelbord's https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Security_Spending_Benchmarks - Paulo's involvement and will be used by the Global Industry Committee to collect stats.
 
* Boaz Gelbord's https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Security_Spending_Benchmarks - Paulo's involvement and will be used by the Global Industry Committee to collect stats.
 +
** Can a set of criterion be established to define OWASP priorities in terms of projects available to be sponsored by our OWASP Members?
 
* Discuss new project creation process: Paulos has directed many new project e-mails for our list and I think we should prioritize our tasks in order to make those projects start correctly. In this sense, integration activities should be prioritized.
 
* Discuss new project creation process: Paulos has directed many new project e-mails for our list and I think we should prioritize our tasks in order to make those projects start correctly. In this sense, integration activities should be prioritized.
 
** Projects moving to release quality:
 
** Projects moving to release quality:
Line 32: Line 33:
  
 
*** discuss a proper operational/coordination workflow
 
*** discuss a proper operational/coordination workflow
 +
[[Category:GPC Meetings]]

Latest revision as of 17:15, 17 March 2009

Agenda for Global Projects & Tools Committee on 20 Jan 2009

Old Business

    • A follow-up on what was done over the results from our first and second meetings.

New Business

    • We need to set up as as possible a new season of code. How will it be done?
    • New projects waiting for Committee's response:
      • Owasp Anti-Malware Project: Defending Web Infrastructures Against Malware' project - Giorgio Fedon, See Appendant (2).
      • Owasp project for VICNUM, Mordecai Kraushar, See Appendant (3).
      • New OWASP Project for SAMM, Pravir Chandra, See Appendant (4)
      • Web Application Harvesting, Esteban Ribičić, See Appendant (5)
    • Process for approving OWASP projects. Is there any? should have?
  • Andrew's Grant proposal request: https://lists.owasp.org/pipermail/owasp-leaders/2009-January/000823.html
  • Closure of Summer Of Code 2008 http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Summer_of_Code_2008
  • Boaz Gelbord's https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Security_Spending_Benchmarks - Paulo's involvement and will be used by the Global Industry Committee to collect stats.
    • Can a set of criterion be established to define OWASP priorities in terms of projects available to be sponsored by our OWASP Members?
  • Discuss new project creation process: Paulos has directed many new project e-mails for our list and I think we should prioritize our tasks in order to make those projects start correctly. In this sense, integration activities should be prioritized.
    • Projects moving to release quality:
      • Anti-Sammy for Java
    • Identfify the list of projects that shall be sponsored by for 2009 - should we consider having one season of quality/cleaning and one season of code?
      • discuss a proper operational/coordination workflow