This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit

GPC Agenda 2009-09-14

Revision as of 20:58, 14 September 2009 by Paulo Coimbra (talk | contribs) (From Previous Meeting)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


From Previous Meeting

  • Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership.
    • Paulo is still working on it.

  • Begin with "state of OWASP" then maximum 1 hour given to each committee during the mini summit to present their issues and topics and board meeting at the end to vote. Thoughts about a panal discussion or debate during summit.
    • Follow up:
      • Brad's draft of a template letter to be used by OWASP Board to be sent off to the committee members' employers explaining they have been invited to particpate in the Mini-Summit.
    • Build an agenda to discuss in the Mini-Summit:
      • A few aspects to focus on:
        • Why hasn't the SoC 09 been launched still?
        • Which criteria should ultimately preside SoC's fund allocation?
        • GPC's new methodologies to manage and assess projects.

  • Projects committee should determine which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangalism, publication, training, etc.....
    • Discuss the possibility of using the "OWASP on the Move" programme to fund the activities above mentioned (projects/project leaders: Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....)
    • Follow up:
      • Matt Tesauro's draft to deal with this kind of issues.
      • Matt's trip to Brasil AppSec - approval of his estimate of cost.

  • Committees can have paypal buttons on their pages to enable sponsors to dedicate the sponsor budget to a certain area. e.g. Education
    • Paulo is working on it with Kate who has just returned today from a short vacancy.

Current Meeting

  • Does it make sense keeping in our new template the field Project Health while the criteria for its assessment haven't been built still? Couldn't we "hide" it until being ready for public display?
    • Can we post in the leaders mailing list inviting our leaders to come up and help us to finish up this set of criteria?
  • Do we all agree with these Dinis' and jeff's perspectives? If so can we make a post in our blog advertising the GPC policy about this issue?

Issues for next Meeting

  • Add here


  • Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1
  • Add here