This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-09-14"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎From Previous Meeting)
(→‎From Previous Meeting)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
*Begin with "state of OWASP" then maximum 1 hour given to each committee during the mini summit to present their issues and topics and board meeting at the end to vote. Thoughts about a panal discussion or debate during summit.  
 
*Begin with "state of OWASP" then maximum 1 hour given to each committee during the mini summit to present their issues and topics and board meeting at the end to vote. Thoughts about a panal discussion or debate during summit.  
 
**Follow up:
 
**Follow up:
−
***Brad's draft of a template letter to be used by OWASP Board to be sent off to the committee members' employers explaining they have been invited to particpate in the Mini-Summit.  
+
***[http://shorttext.com/vcyjugly5 Brad's draft of a template letter] to be used by OWASP Board to be sent off to the committee members' employers explaining they have been invited to particpate in the Mini-Summit.  
−
**Build an agenda to discuss in the Mini-Summit.
+
**Build an agenda to discuss in the Mini-Summit:
 
***A few aspects to focus on:
 
***A few aspects to focus on:
 
****Why hasn't the SoC 09 been launched still?
 
****Why hasn't the SoC 09 been launched still?
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
== Current Meeting ==  
 
== Current Meeting ==  
 +
 +
* Does it make sense keeping in our new template the field '''''Project Health''''' while the criteria for its assessment haven't been built still? Couldn't we "hide" it until being ready for public display?
 +
**Can we post in the leaders mailing list inviting our leaders to come up and help us to finish up this set of criteria?
 +
* Do we all agree with these [http://shorttext.com/imjrt5ikq Dinis' and jeff's perspectives]? If so can we make a post in our [http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/ blog] advertising the GPC policy about this issue?
 +
 +
= Issues for next Meeting  =
  
 
* Add here
 
* Add here
Line 44: Line 50:
 
= Minutes  =
 
= Minutes  =
  
−
Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1  
+
* Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1  
−
 
+
* Add here
−
 
 
−
= Next Meeting  =
 
−
 
 
−
XXXX
 
  
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
  
 
[[Category:GPC_Meetings]]
 
[[Category:GPC_Meetings]]

Latest revision as of 20:58, 14 September 2009

Agenda

From Previous Meeting

  • Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership.
    • Paulo is still working on it.
  • Begin with "state of OWASP" then maximum 1 hour given to each committee during the mini summit to present their issues and topics and board meeting at the end to vote. Thoughts about a panal discussion or debate during summit.
    • Follow up:
      • Brad's draft of a template letter to be used by OWASP Board to be sent off to the committee members' employers explaining they have been invited to particpate in the Mini-Summit.
    • Build an agenda to discuss in the Mini-Summit:
      • A few aspects to focus on:
        • Why hasn't the SoC 09 been launched still?
        • Which criteria should ultimately preside SoC's fund allocation?
        • GPC's new methodologies to manage and assess projects.
  • Projects committee should determine which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangalism, publication, training, etc.....
    • Discuss the possibility of using the "OWASP on the Move" programme to fund the activities above mentioned (projects/project leaders: Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....)
    • Follow up:
      • Matt Tesauro's draft to deal with this kind of issues.
      • Matt's trip to Brasil AppSec - approval of his estimate of cost.
  • Committees can have paypal buttons on their pages to enable sponsors to dedicate the sponsor budget to a certain area. e.g. Education
    • Paulo is working on it with Kate who has just returned today from a short vacancy.

Current Meeting

  • Does it make sense keeping in our new template the field Project Health while the criteria for its assessment haven't been built still? Couldn't we "hide" it until being ready for public display?
    • Can we post in the leaders mailing list inviting our leaders to come up and help us to finish up this set of criteria?
  • Do we all agree with these Dinis' and jeff's perspectives? If so can we make a post in our blog advertising the GPC policy about this issue?

Issues for next Meeting

  • Add here

Minutes

  • Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1
  • Add here
Retrieved from "https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=GPC_Agenda_2009-09-14&oldid=68857"