This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit

GPC Agenda 2009-05-01

Revision as of 21:29, 1 May 2009 by Jason Li (talk | contribs) (Minutes)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


Meeting started 2100 GMT

  • Determine exit criteria for SoC
  • Determine "core criteria" for projects (assessment frame)
  • Determine nomenclature for L0/L1/L2 for projects and L1/L2/L3 for releases
  • Discuss entrance criteria to L2 for projects (if time permits)
    • Present "Project Health" proposal:
      • Define project "health" characteristics (e.g., frequency of releases, adoption rate, etc)
      • Entrance criteria into L2 is 50% of the "health" characteristics
      • Entrance criteria into L3 is 100% of the "health" characteristics (or board/GPC discretion?)
      • In general, projects will not backslide from L2 to L1 or L1 to L0; projects will move in and out of L3
  • Discuss entrance criteria for "archived" projects (if time permits)

Meeting ended 2130 GMT


  • Agreed on Project Health Proposal
  • Agreed on Alpha, Beta, Stable designations for releases
  • Agreed that we should impose a naming convention for releases to prevent confusion between version numbers and assessment criteria rating (e.g., v1.203-beta for an Alpha quality release)
  • Agreed that "Level X" servers as appropriate nomenclature for Project Health
  • Agreed that projects can backslide from Level 2 to Level 1

Action Items

  • Jason will summarize survey results and present at Monday's meeting