This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "GPC Agenda 2009-05-01"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: =Agenda= - Determine exit criteria for SoC - Determine "core criteria" for projects - Determine nomenclature for L0/L1/L2 for projects and L1/L2/L3 for releases - Discuss entrance criteria...)
 
(Minutes)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Agenda=
 
=Agenda=
- Determine exit criteria for SoC
+
Meeting started 2100 GMT
- Determine "core criteria" for projects
+
 
- Determine nomenclature for L0/L1/L2 for projects and L1/L2/L3 for releases
+
* Determine exit criteria for SoC
- Discuss entrance criteria to L2 for projects (if time permits)
+
* Determine "core criteria" for projects (assessment frame)
 +
* Determine nomenclature for L0/L1/L2 for projects and L1/L2/L3 for releases
 +
* Discuss entrance criteria to L2 for projects (if time permits)
 +
** Present "Project Health" proposal:
 +
*** Define project "health" characteristics (e.g., frequency of releases, adoption rate, etc)
 +
*** Entrance criteria into L2 is 50% of the "health" characteristics
 +
*** Entrance criteria into L3 is 100% of the "health" characteristics (or board/GPC discretion?)
 +
*** In general, projects will not backslide from L2 to L1 or L1 to L0; projects ''will'' move in and out of L3
 +
* Discuss entrance criteria for "archived" projects (if time permits)
 +
 
 +
Meeting ended 2130 GMT
  
 
=Minutes=
 
=Minutes=
 +
* Agreed on Project Health Proposal
 +
* Agreed on Alpha, Beta, Stable designations for releases
 +
* Agreed that we should impose a naming convention for releases to prevent confusion between version numbers and assessment criteria rating (e.g., v1.203-beta for an Alpha quality release)
 +
* Agreed that "Level X" servers as appropriate nomenclature for Project Health
 +
* Agreed that projects can backslide from Level 2 to Level 1
  
 
=Action Items=
 
=Action Items=
 +
* Jason will summarize survey results and present at Monday's meeting
 +
 +
[[Category:GPC Meetings]]

Latest revision as of 21:29, 1 May 2009

Agenda

Meeting started 2100 GMT

  • Determine exit criteria for SoC
  • Determine "core criteria" for projects (assessment frame)
  • Determine nomenclature for L0/L1/L2 for projects and L1/L2/L3 for releases
  • Discuss entrance criteria to L2 for projects (if time permits)
    • Present "Project Health" proposal:
      • Define project "health" characteristics (e.g., frequency of releases, adoption rate, etc)
      • Entrance criteria into L2 is 50% of the "health" characteristics
      • Entrance criteria into L3 is 100% of the "health" characteristics (or board/GPC discretion?)
      • In general, projects will not backslide from L2 to L1 or L1 to L0; projects will move in and out of L3
  • Discuss entrance criteria for "archived" projects (if time permits)

Meeting ended 2130 GMT

Minutes

  • Agreed on Project Health Proposal
  • Agreed on Alpha, Beta, Stable designations for releases
  • Agreed that we should impose a naming convention for releases to prevent confusion between version numbers and assessment criteria rating (e.g., v1.203-beta for an Alpha quality release)
  • Agreed that "Level X" servers as appropriate nomenclature for Project Health
  • Agreed that projects can backslide from Level 2 to Level 1

Action Items

  • Jason will summarize survey results and present at Monday's meeting