This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

February 2, 2010

From OWASP
Revision as of 19:41, 1 February 2010 by Jeff Williams (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search


AGENDA

http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Board_Meetings

When
Tue February 2, 2010 5pm – 6pm GMT (no daylight saving)
Where
1-866-534-4754 Code: 7452912855
Leader
Jeff Williams
Minutes
Kate Hartmann
Participants
Please review the progress of the Global Committee http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Global_Committee_Pages and prepare your report to status on old business and new business.


OLD BUSINESS

TBD Title
TBD Description


NEW BUSINESS

Committees (and projects) should post items (in the form of a proposal) here for consideration by the Board

2009 Financial Results
The final numbers for 2009 have been prepared.
Proposal - OWASP should create a global OWASP-Alerts mailing list
There has been a request for the creation of a single OWASP-wide vulnerability reporting mailing list, OWASP-alerts, so that corporations can monitor for vulnerabilities in our software. This is a PCI requirement. The items posted here would be security vulnerabilities in our libraries (ESAPI, AntiSamy, Encoding, and maybe our tools). Assuming we support the idea, we need to decide who would moderate the list.
Proposal - OWASP should move off of mailman and onto groups.owasp.org
This brings the full power and ease of administration of Google Groups to an OWASP domain. The existing archives have been uploaded to Google docs where anyone can search them. The only real hiccup is that people must have a google account to use this (or an owasp.org account). We can force add all existing members and their transition to the new list should be seamless - this will get them email list functionality. If they want the full forum, they'll need to have a google account. One other hiccup is that OWASP-ALL will generate one email per list. We can manage a list of lists, but any message will get multiplexed across all of them. Ideas?