This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:OWASP Project Process"
From OWASP
(1) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
-- 27.jan.16 [[user:achim|achim]] | -- 27.jan.16 [[user:achim|achim]] | ||
| − | ;2: ... | + | ;2: ...Agree Achim, this categorising system does not work. Please suggest new labels. To clarify, none of this is my invention. I'm just a volunteer |
Latest revision as of 04:09, 20 February 2016
Insert your comments here about what we should change/adjust/modity in the process to better serve the community (Project Leaders, Members, Users of the Projects)
- 1
- accoding Step 10: please note that documentation projects most likely will not be updated, at least not continously. PLease define an exception for such projects.
- Also, as discussed many times last few months, a tool may not be "bad" or "abandoned" if there is no activity. Tools may have a long life cicle without updates. Just marking them as "inactive" without further tags may mislead readers about the quality of such a tool. Beside the tag "inactive", we need a tag related to the "quality" (named it better).
-- 27.jan.16 achim
- 2
- ...Agree Achim, this categorising system does not work. Please suggest new labels. To clarify, none of this is my invention. I'm just a volunteer
