This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org

Difference between revisions of "Catch NullPointerException"

From OWASP
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
http://www.textcomongetrict.com
 
{{Template:Vulnerability}}
 
{{Template:Vulnerability}}
 
{{Template:Fortify}}
 
{{Template:Fortify}}

Revision as of 20:26, 22 May 2009

http://www.textcomongetrict.com This is a Vulnerability. To view all vulnerabilities, please see the Vulnerability Category page.

This article includes content generously donated to OWASP by MicroFocus Logo.png

Last revision (mm/dd/yy): 05/22/2009

Vulnerabilities Table of Contents

Description

It is generally a bad practice to catch NullPointerException.

Programmers typically catch NullPointerException under three circumstances:

  1. The program contains a null pointer dereference. Catching the resulting exception was easier than fixing the underlying problem.
  2. The program explicitly throws a NullPointerException to signal an error condition.
  3. The code is part of a test harness that supplies unexpected input to the classes under test.

Of these three circumstances, only the last is acceptable.

Risk Factors

TBD

Examples

The following code mistakenly catches a NullPointerException.

	  try {
		mysteryMethod();
	  }
	  catch (NullPointerException npe) {
	  }

Related Attacks


Related Vulnerabilities


Related Controls


Related Technical Impacts


References

Note: A reference to related CWE or CAPEC article should be added when exists. Eg: