This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "CRV2 CodeReviewAgile"
(Created page with "Agile Development is well suited for code review, as two of its best practices are "peer programming" and "peer review". The fis The last one is enforced by the usage of too...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Charly, remember that it's "code review guide", not "testing guide" | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | =Some definitions about Agile= | ||
| + | |||
| + | ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | Agile Development is well suited for code review, as two of its best practices are "peer programming" and "peer review". AD incorporates code review in itself | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Peer Programming== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This technique consists of ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Peer Review== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This one is enforced by the usage of tools like .... that ask another user for a code review before commiting to the versioning system. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==LifeCycle== | ||
AD tries to keep the code review as near as possible to the development phase, there is no such thing as develop, test, code review cycle. | AD tries to keep the code review as near as possible to the development phase, there is no such thing as develop, test, code review cycle. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Clean Code and "Smells"== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==The role of testing== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is so fundamental, that the xDD pervades Agile, test first, test earlier | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==continuous integration== | ||
| + | it can trigger static code analysis | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==The role of automatic static code analysis in the Agile Methodologies== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Test Driven Development== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It aims at code simplicity due to the need of making it testeable | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Behavior Driven Development== | ||
| + | |||
| + | .... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Domaing Driven Design== | ||
| + | |||
| + | .... | ||
Revision as of 00:50, 20 June 2013
Charly, remember that it's "code review guide", not "testing guide"
Some definitions about Agile
...
Agile Development is well suited for code review, as two of its best practices are "peer programming" and "peer review". AD incorporates code review in itself
Peer Programming
This technique consists of ...
Peer Review
This one is enforced by the usage of tools like .... that ask another user for a code review before commiting to the versioning system.
LifeCycle
AD tries to keep the code review as near as possible to the development phase, there is no such thing as develop, test, code review cycle.
Clean Code and "Smells"
The role of testing
It is so fundamental, that the xDD pervades Agile, test first, test earlier
continuous integration
it can trigger static code analysis
The role of automatic static code analysis in the Agile Methodologies
Test Driven Development
It aims at code simplicity due to the need of making it testeable
Behavior Driven Development
....
Domaing Driven Design
....
