This site is the archived OWASP Foundation Wiki and is no longer accepting Account Requests.
To view the new OWASP Foundation website, please visit https://owasp.org
Difference between revisions of "Project Information:template Code Crawler - Final Review - Second Reviewer - F"
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" | {| style="width:100%" border="0" align="center" | ||
− | ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#4058A0; color:white"|<font color="white">'''FINAL REVIEW''' | + | ! colspan="3" align="center" style="background:#4058A0; color:white"|<font color="white">'''FINAL REVIEW ''' |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART I''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART I''' | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Code Crawler|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | 1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Code Crawler|'''the assumed ones''']], please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Code Crawler is a stable an easy to use tool |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Code Crawler|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | 2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration [[OWASP Summer of Code 2008 Applications - Need Futher Clarifications#Code Crawler|'''the assumed ones''']], please quantify in terms of percentage. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|100% |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|Documentation to improve. It should be nice to indicate how many High, Medium and low vulnerabilities the tool has founded. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | | style="width:25%; background:white" align="center"|'''PART II''' | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | 1. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Alpha Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | 2. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Beta Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|None. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | 3. Having into consideration the [[:Category:OWASP Project Assessment|OWASP Project Assessment Methodology]] which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of '''Release Quality''' status? | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|The project seems to be in beta quality. It does a quick code review of .net and java files, but needs more documentations and some improvement from the OWASP Code Review project. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | | style="width:25%; background:#7B8ABD" align="center"| | ||
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | 4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. | ||
− | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"| | + | | colspan="2" style="width:75%; background:#cccccc" align="left"|More feedback from the OWASP Community. |
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 00:02, 17 March 2009
Clik here to return to the previous page.
FINAL REVIEW | ||
---|---|---|
PART I | ||
Project Deliveries & Objectives |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please exemplify writing down those of them that haven't been realised. |
Code Crawler is a stable an easy to use tool | |
2. At what extent have the project deliveries & objectives been accomplished? Having in consideration the assumed ones, please quantify in terms of percentage. |
100% | |
3. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
Documentation to improve. It should be nice to indicate how many High, Medium and low vulnerabilities the tool has founded. | |
PART II | ||
Assessment Criteria |
||
QUESTIONS | ANSWERS | |
1. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Alpha Quality status? |
None. | |
2. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Beta Quality status? |
None. | |
3. Having into consideration the OWASP Project Assessment Methodology which criteria, if any, haven’t been fulfilled in terms of Release Quality status? |
The project seems to be in beta quality. It does a quick code review of .net and java files, but needs more documentations and some improvement from the OWASP Code Review project. | |
4. Please do use the right hand side column to provide advice and make work suggestions. |
More feedback from the OWASP Community. |