Difference between pages "User:Pradeep Rajguru" and "Polls"

From OWASP
(Difference between pages)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Creating user page for new user.)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
OWASP Polls are a way of getting the 'pulse' of the OWASP community - they should not be considered 'binding'.
  
 +
They may be about any subject that people feel may be of interest to the OWASP community.
 +
 +
'''All polls require an [[Owasp.org email_address]] and will publish full details of the responses.'''
 +
 +
If you ask for the form to be shared with you from a non OWASP address then you will just get a canned response explaining why this will not currently happen.
 +
 +
To add a poll please contact [[User:Simon Bennetts|Simon Bennetts]]
 +
 +
== ''' Current Poll(s)''' ==
 +
 +
* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/forms/d/1avUXeHi--oWXoHNhTOLN6jIIIHZ6obBnzFZMYHz03B4/viewform?usp=send_form Do you think that OWASP board candidates should be announced prior to the 'Call for Candidates' deadline?]
 +
* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/spreadsheets/d/1TSGRicIIRa3Bpq76xItr9jsrDEcOlim0an8pKdqNuTQ/edit#gid=756931375 Interim results]
 +
* Date started: 2014 July 17
 +
* Proposed close date: July 24
 +
* Author: [[User:Simon Bennetts|Simon Bennetts]]
 +
 +
 +
Note that only OWASP members can see the 'live' results and the statement before its release. A summary of the results will be made public when the poll closes, but the full details will stay restricted to OWASP members to prevent email harvesting.
 +
 +
 +
== Past polls ==
 +
 +
* '''OWASP Training Contract'''
 +
* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/spreadsheets/d/1oDmVQKlFQIvnfXJOnUaEG7UB5aQ_QpYbZDnA1AHZAns/edit?usp=sharing Final results]
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! Should OWASP allow other options in addition to the current training model?
 +
! # votes
 +
|-
 +
| No, please leave it as is.
 +
| 2
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to donate their 40% of the proceedings to the OWASP Foundation and/or an OWASP project/chapter of choice.
 +
| 8
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to receive travel expenses as their sole compensation and the remaining proceedings will go to the OWASP Foundation.
 +
| 8
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to deliver their trainings for free at major OWASP conferences.
 +
| 6
 +
|}
 +
 +
* Date started: 19 Feb 2014
 +
* Date closed: 22 Feb 2014
 +
* Author: [[User:Fabio.e.cerullo|Fabio Cerullo]]
 +
 +
 +
 +
* ''' Is it acceptable for organizations to place restrictions on OWASP presenting any material at any other events? '''
 +
* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/forms/d/1Xdoo61zNTrYUiC729zmzTSqxJVkKohB8QP-mckR_xQs/viewanalytics Final results]
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference?
 +
! # votes
 +
! %
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, commercial organizations make these decisions to protect and add value to their events, if we want to present at them we should abide by their rules
 +
| 0
 +
| 0%
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, as above, but only under exceptional circumstances and it should require an OWASP board vote
 +
| 3
 +
| 10%
 +
|-
 +
| No, we should never accept any such restrictions
 +
| 27
 +
| 87%
 +
|-
 +
| Other
 +
| 1
 +
| 3%
 +
|}
 +
 +
* Date started: 2014 Jan 9
 +
* Date closed: Jan 29
 +
* Author: [[User:Simon Bennetts|Simon Bennetts]]
 +
 +
 +
* ''' Should OWASP give developer training at RSA? '''
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference?
 +
! # votes
 +
! %
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, this should be an official OWASP initiative
 +
| 31
 +
| 43%
 +
|-
 +
| No, OWASP should publicly pull out
 +
| 25
 +
| 35%
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, as long as the training is given as individuals an not an official OWASP initiative
 +
| 8
 +
| 11%
 +
|-
 +
| The board should decide
 +
| 7
 +
| 10%
 +
|-
 +
| Other
 +
| 1
 +
| 1%
 +
|-
 +
! Should OWASP make a public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea
 +
! # votes
 +
! %
 +
|-
 +
| Yes
 +
| 67
 +
| 93%
 +
|-
 +
| No
 +
| 5
 +
| 7%
 +
|}
 +
* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/forms/d/1CB2J1uo6ggVHjMRPrpaHw4goy3NX0Z5NH82w1poW3wk/viewanalytics Full results]
 +
* Date started: 2014 Jan 7
 +
* Date closed: 2014 Jan 15
 +
* Author: [[User:Simon Bennetts|Simon Bennetts]]
 +
 +
 +
* '''Do you support OWASP to make the following public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea?'''
 +
The text of the statement is here: [http://owasp.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/owasp-statement-on-security-of-internet.html]
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|-
 +
! Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference?
 +
! # votes
 +
! %
 +
|-
 +
| Yes, we shall release it
 +
| 30
 +
| 100%
 +
|-
 +
| No, we shall not release it
 +
| 0
 +
| 0%
 +
|}
 +
* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/forms/d/18kngpGOR4-ySYCZ-74zAgjyE2elpPp2Gg780mtbZDu0/viewanalytics Full results]
 +
* Date started: 2014 Jan 23
 +
* Proposed close date: Jan 27 14:00 CST
 +
* Author: [[User:tgondrom |Tobias Gondrom]]

Latest revision as of 14:00, 17 July 2014

OWASP Polls are a way of getting the 'pulse' of the OWASP community - they should not be considered 'binding'.

They may be about any subject that people feel may be of interest to the OWASP community.

All polls require an Owasp.org email_address and will publish full details of the responses.

If you ask for the form to be shared with you from a non OWASP address then you will just get a canned response explaining why this will not currently happen.

To add a poll please contact Simon Bennetts

Current Poll(s)


Note that only OWASP members can see the 'live' results and the statement before its release. A summary of the results will be made public when the poll closes, but the full details will stay restricted to OWASP members to prevent email harvesting.


Past polls

Should OWASP allow other options in addition to the current training model? # votes
No, please leave it as is. 2
Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to donate their 40% of the proceedings to the OWASP Foundation and/or an OWASP project/chapter of choice. 8
Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to receive travel expenses as their sole compensation and the remaining proceedings will go to the OWASP Foundation. 8
Yes, OWASP should allow trainers to deliver their trainings for free at major OWASP conferences. 6
  • Date started: 19 Feb 2014
  • Date closed: 22 Feb 2014
  • Author: Fabio Cerullo


  • Is it acceptable for organizations to place restrictions on OWASP presenting any material at any other events?
  • Final results
Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? # votes  %
Yes, commercial organizations make these decisions to protect and add value to their events, if we want to present at them we should abide by their rules 0 0%
Yes, as above, but only under exceptional circumstances and it should require an OWASP board vote 3 10%
No, we should never accept any such restrictions 27 87%
Other 1 3%


  • Should OWASP give developer training at RSA?
Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? # votes  %
Yes, this should be an official OWASP initiative 31 43%
No, OWASP should publicly pull out 25 35%
Yes, as long as the training is given as individuals an not an official OWASP initiative 8 11%
The board should decide 7 10%
Other 1 1%
Should OWASP make a public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea # votes  %
Yes 67 93%
No 5 7%


  • Do you support OWASP to make the following public statement to the effect that subverting/weakening crypto is a bad idea?

The text of the statement is here: [1]

Should OWASP give a developer training cource at the 2014 RSA conference? # votes  %
Yes, we shall release it 30 100%
No, we shall not release it 0 0%
Retrieved from "https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=User:Pradeep_Rajguru&oldid=178899"