Template:Assessment Questions - Documents - Input - Revision history

Paulo Coimbra at 16:40, 10 July 2009

2009-07-10T16:40:30Z

Paulo Coimbra at 16:39, 10 July 2009

2009-07-10T16:39:35Z

Paulo Coimbra: Created page with '{{ Template:Assessment Questions - Documents | 1. Does the document consider the [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Writing_Style OWASP Writing Style]? = answer 1 | 2. Do co…'

2009-07-10T16:38:57Z

Created page with '{{ Template:Assessment Questions - Documents | 1. Does the document consider the [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Writing_Style OWASP Writing Style]? = answer 1 | 2. Do co…'

New page

{{ Template:Assessment Questions - Documents

| 1. Does the document consider the [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Writing_Style OWASP Writing Style]?
= answer 1

| 2. Do contents from wiki articles match download-able documents? (PDF and .doc versions)
= answer

| 3. Does the document have an “About This Document” section which allows the end user to get an overview of the state of the document?
= answer

| 4. How completely does the release address the goal of the project? Is the overall document complete in structure and organization? Are any missing or incomplete sections critical enough to keep the document at an Alpha quality level?
= answer

| 5. Have all the Beta Reviewer Action Items been completed? These will need to be completed if they have not already occurred during a previous assessment.
= answer

| 6. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s).
= answer

| 7. Does the document substantially address the application security issues it was created to solve?
= answer

| 8. Does the document respect OWASP Writing Style and OWASP Template for Docs?
= answer

| 9. Have you noted any limitations of the document that are not already documented by the project release lead?
= answer

| 10. Would you consider using this document in your day to day work assuming your professional work includes a reason to use this document? Would you recommend this document to others in the profession? Why or why not?
= answer

| 11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality?
= answer

|}

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 | 2. Do contents from wiki articles match download-able documents? (PDF and .doc versions)
-= answer
+= answer 2
 | 3. Does the document have an “About This Document” section which allows the end user to get an overview of the state of the document?
-= answer
+= answer 3
 | 4. How completely does the release address the goal of the project? Is the overall document complete in structure and organization? Are any missing or incomplete sections critical enough to keep the document at an Alpha quality level?
-= answer
+= answer 4
 | 5. Have all the Beta Reviewer Action Items been completed? These will need to be completed if they have not already occurred during a previous assessment.
-= answer
+= answer 5
 | 6. Have any limitations been documented? Please point out the link(s).
-= answer
+= answer 6
 | 7. Does the document substantially address the application security issues it was created to solve?
-= answer
+= answer 7
 | 8. Does the document respect OWASP Writing Style and OWASP Template for Docs?
-= answer
+= answer 8
 | 9. Have you noted any limitations of the document that are not already documented by the project release lead?
-= answer
+= answer 9
 | 10. Would you consider using this document in your day to day work assuming your professional work includes a reason to use this document? Would you recommend this document to others in the profession? Why or why not?
-= answer
+= answer 10
 | 11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality?
-= answer
+= answer 11
 }}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{ Template:Assessment Questions - Documents
+{{ :Template:Assessment Questions - Documents
 | 1. Does the document consider the [http://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Writing_Style OWASP Writing Style]?
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 | 11. What, if anything, is missing which would make this a more useful document? Is what is missing critical enough to keep the release at a beta quality?
 = answer
+}}