https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3ACode_Review_Preparation 2026-05-16T07:39:44Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.27.2 https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Talk:Code_Review_Preparation&diff=88938&oldid=prev 2010-09-09T15:03:15Z

<p>Added notification that the discussion topic has been addressed.</p> <table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr style='vertical-align: top;' lang='en'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black; text-align: center;">Revision as of 15:03, 9 September 2010</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l4" >Line 4:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 4:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>One further thought: if it's supposed to be &quot;availability&quot;, it may be valuable to add discussion of integrity and confidentiality, as well.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>&#160;</td><td style="background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #e6e6e6; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>One further thought: if it's supposed to be &quot;availability&quot;, it may be valuable to add discussion of integrity and confidentiality, as well.</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&#160;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color:black; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:Thank you for pointing it out, it has now been addressed in revision oldid=88937. --[[User:Thomas Herlea|Thomas Herlea]] 15:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Thomas Herlea https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Talk:Code_Review_Preparation&diff=88936&oldid=prev 2010-09-09T14:52:27Z

<p>Discussion topic moved here from the article where the content came from, too</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>In ''Discovery: Gathering the information'', under ''before we start'', number 4. Does this *really* mean &quot;importance&quot;? It's possible for a very important system to be unavailable most of the time (i.e. a root cert server might be shut down, when not actually needed, and have not network connectivity, making it unavailable except for a local console). The description is of availability, not &quot;importance&quot;. <br /> <br /> If it's supposed to be about availability, then it should prolly be renamed. If it's about &quot;importance&quot;, then &quot;importance&quot; needs to be clearly defined. --[[User:Atk|Atk]] 13:55, 28 August 2007 (EDT)<br /> <br /> One further thought: if it's supposed to be &quot;availability&quot;, it may be valuable to add discussion of integrity and confidentiality, as well.</div>

Thomas Herlea