Talk:Chairs: March 14, 2011 - Revision history

Dc: /* Shared Budget Items */

2011-03-14T16:37:18Z

‎Shared Budget Items

2011-03-14T16:34:30Z

‎Raising Revenue

2011-03-14T14:27:44Z

2011-03-14T14:26:26Z

‎Cross-Committee Concerns

2011-03-14T14:25:34Z

‎Cross-Committee Concerns

2011-03-14T14:24:42Z

‎Cross-Committee Concerns

2011-03-14T13:44:02Z

‎Cross-Committee Concerns

2011-03-11T19:17:42Z

‎OWASP Points Program: adding bullets

2011-03-11T19:17:11Z

Adding wiki format of GPC Governance Doc

2011-03-11T06:04:31Z

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 * Marketing/Promotion?
 * Committee Summit?
 [[User:Jason Li|Jason Li]] 01:02, 11 March 2011 (EST)

@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 * Corporate Membership Dues
 ** Increase
-** Tiered
+** [[ProposedTieredCorporateMembership|Tiered]]
 * Conference Tickets
 ** Increase

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 14 March 2011
Line 34:		Line 34:

	[[User:Jason Li\|Jason Li]] 01:02, 11 March 2011 (EST)		[[User:Jason Li\|Jason Li]] 01:02, 11 March 2011 (EST)
		+
		+	* Industry Committee would like to change mission statement (as drafted by Joe Bernik) to:
		+	''To expand the engagement of OWASP and its mission amongst the public and private sector verticals, through outreach; including presentations, development of position papers and collaborative efforts. The Industry committee serves as the voice of OWASP within the public and private sector and the channel through which OWASP aligns its efforts to the demands of the market.''
		+
		+	Thoughts?
		+
		+	[[User:Sarah Baso\|Sarah Baso]] 10:27, 14 March 2011 (EDT)

	== OWASP Points Program ==		== OWASP Points Program ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 14 March 2011
Line 79:		Line 79:

	Kate thinks that before we can consider merging/ending a committee we need to understand what the mission and goal of the committees are. Initial purpose of connections was along the lines of PR and outreach (newsletters, etc) and this is outside the Industry committee. From what I've seen, the Industry committee is actually more in line with Membership as it serves as outreach to corporations to involve them in OWASP.		Kate thinks that before we can consider merging/ending a committee we need to understand what the mission and goal of the committees are. Initial purpose of connections was along the lines of PR and outreach (newsletters, etc) and this is outside the Industry committee. From what I've seen, the Industry committee is actually more in line with Membership as it serves as outreach to corporations to involve them in OWASP.
−		+	[[User:KateHartmann\|KateHartmann]] 10:26, 14 March 2011 (EDT)
−	~~````~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 14 March 2011
Line 79:		Line 79:

	Kate thinks that before we can consider merging/ending a committee we need to understand what the mission and goal of the committees are. Initial purpose of connections was along the lines of PR and outreach (newsletters, etc) and this is outside the Industry committee. From what I've seen, the Industry committee is actually more in line with Membership as it serves as outreach to corporations to involve them in OWASP.		Kate thinks that before we can consider merging/ending a committee we need to understand what the mission and goal of the committees are. Initial purpose of connections was along the lines of PR and outreach (newsletters, etc) and this is outside the Industry committee. From what I've seen, the Industry committee is actually more in line with Membership as it serves as outreach to corporations to involve them in OWASP.
		+
		+	````

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:24, 14 March 2011
Line 75:		Line 75:

	[[User:Jason Li\|Jason Li]] 01:02, 11 March 2011 (EST)		[[User:Jason Li\|Jason Li]] 01:02, 11 March 2011 (EST)
		+
		+	* Speaker's Sub Committee (education/chapters/conferences)
		+
		+	Kate thinks that before we can consider merging/ending a committee we need to understand what the mission and goal of the committees are. Initial purpose of connections was along the lines of PR and outreach (newsletters, etc) and this is outside the Industry committee. From what I've seen, the Industry committee is actually more in line with Membership as it serves as outreach to corporations to involve them in OWASP.

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 * OWASP Academies (Chapters, Education)
 * Industry + Connections merger?
 [[User:Jason Li|Jason Li]] 01:02, 11 March 2011 (EST)

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 == OWASP Points Program ==
-[[:Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session071]]
+* [[:Summit_2011_Working_Sessions/Session071]]
-[[OWASP Points]]
+* [[OWASP Points]]
 [[User:Mark.bristow|Mark.bristow]]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 * [[Global_Conferences_Committee_Governance|Conferences Committee Governance]]
-* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1liiIpZE9EeVHL7CIGHQsXybtqsVGSJ1i5s9oSWSnWfE/edit?hl=en&pli=1# Projects Committee Governance]
+* [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1liiIpZE9EeVHL7CIGHQsXybtqsVGSJ1i5s9oSWSnWfE/edit?hl=en&pli=1# Projects Committee Governance] ([[:GPC/Governance|Wiki format]])
 * [[Global_Chapters_Committee_Governance|Chapters Committee Governance]]
 * Membership Committee

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Talk Page Guidelines==
-* Sign your name after a comment by using four tildas (“<code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>). Mediawiki automatically replaces this with the right thing
+* Sign your name after a comment by using four tildas (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). Mediawiki automatically replaces this with the right thing
 * Add a new discussion point with the level 2 heading (==Example==) or the '+' sign
 * Add inline replies using increasing number of colons (:)