<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Minutes_from_12%2F17%2F2010_Call</id>
		<title>Minutes from 12/17/2010 Call - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Minutes_from_12%2F17%2F2010_Call"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Minutes_from_12/17/2010_Call&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-16T20:11:27Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.27.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Minutes_from_12/17/2010_Call&amp;diff=97336&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>KateHartmann: Created page with 'The Call Ground Rules were used to discuss and validate the &quot;Values Ordered by Vote Total&quot; posted on the TMC wiki page.  1) Many points of view were expressed for each of the top…'</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php?title=Minutes_from_12/17/2010_Call&amp;diff=97336&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2010-12-20T22:38:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#039;The Call Ground Rules were used to discuss and validate the &amp;quot;Values Ordered by Vote Total&amp;quot; posted on the TMC wiki page.  1) Many points of view were expressed for each of the top…&amp;#039;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Call Ground Rules were used to discuss and validate the &amp;quot;Values Ordered by Vote Total&amp;quot; posted on the TMC wiki page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) Many points of view were expressed for each of the top 10 values listed. A consensus of &amp;quot;validated as a value&amp;quot; was reached on: Vendor Neutral, Openness, Non-Profit, Global, Community, Open Source, Visibility and Ethics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) Openness, visibility and transparency were tentatively combined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) Worldwide was offered as a synonym for Global.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) No consensus was reached on Applications Security Focused as a value. It was suggested as a part of Core Purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5) No consensus was reached on Effortocracy as a value. It or maybe Meritocracy should be in a definition wording.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6) The remaining 16 listed values were discussed and suggested as good words for inclusion in definitions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7) Open Source Community proposed by Dinis and Jeff's Dec 16 email with 5 suggested values were both part of the discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8) There was also discussion on alternative word structures for values and definitions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the Jim Collins article, Core Values and Core Purpose are the two parts of Core Ideology (pages 66-67). They are closely related, but different parts of the whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEXT STEPS:&lt;br /&gt;
1) Based on today's Core Values Selection call, each Board Member is to email their suggested values and definitions for discussion on the next values selection call.&lt;br /&gt;
2) December 23 is the date for the next Core Values Selection call.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KateHartmann</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>