GPC Agenda 2009-11-23 - Revision history

Paulo Coimbra: Undo revision 74285 by Paulo Coimbra (Talk)

2009-11-28T18:28:02Z

Undo revision 74285 by Paulo Coimbra (Talk)

Paulo Coimbra at 18:27, 28 November 2009

2009-11-28T18:27:25Z

Bradcausey: /* Current Meeting */

2009-11-24T17:51:38Z

‎Current Meeting

Paulo Coimbra: /* Current Meeting */

2009-11-23T22:52:33Z

‎Current Meeting

Leocavallari: /* Current Meeting */

2009-11-23T19:12:49Z

‎Current Meeting

Paulo Coimbra at 18:21, 23 November 2009

2009-11-23T18:21:15Z

Paulo Coimbra at 17:30, 23 November 2009

2009-11-23T17:30:50Z

Paulo Coimbra: moved GPC Agenda 2009-11-16 to GPC Agenda 2009-11-23

2009-11-23T17:00:14Z

moved GPC Agenda 2009-11-16 to GPC Agenda 2009-11-23

Paulo Coimbra at 16:28, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T16:28:52Z

Paulo Coimbra at 16:27, 16 November 2009

2009-11-16T16:27:29Z

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 == Current Meeting  ==
-*Reviewers Drive,
+*Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum?
-** [http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/ Brad's Post],
+**Brazilian AppSec Conference
-** [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|Wiki page to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers ]].
+**Brazilian book that has a translated version of Top10 "integrally", without any reference to OWASP
-**Next phase?
+*We should discuss the GPC "Chair" based on discussions at the Summit in DC. I am willing to take this on, but we can discuss further on the next call. (Brad)
-***It seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.
 == From Previous Meeting/Follow up  ==

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 == Current Meeting  ==
-*Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum?
+*Reviewers Drive,
-**Brazilian AppSec Conference
+** [http://globalprojectscommittee.wordpress.com/2009/11/27/new-drive-for-project-reviewers/ Brad's Post],
-**Brazilian book that has a translated version of Top10 "integrally", without any reference to OWASP
+** [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|Wiki page to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers ]].
-*We should discuss the GPC "Chair" based on discussions at the Summit in DC. I am willing to take this on, but we can discuss further on the next call. (Brad)
+**Next phase?
+***It seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.
 == From Previous Meeting/Follow up  ==

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 == Current Meeting  ==
 *[[:Summit 2009|"OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"]]/[[:OWASP AppSec DC 2009]] - Wrap-up:
 **Decisions made in DC with impact on GPC activity,
 **Has the GPC had the opportunity to contact M. Bobersky to answer his questions? [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en M. Boberski's questions]
-* Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum?
+*Leo wants to discuss about issues on usage of OWASP resources. Is this the right forum?
 **Brazilian AppSec Conference
 **Brazilian book that has a translated version of Top10 "integrally", without any reference to OWASP
 ----
 *Projects
-** [[:Category:OWASP_ModSecurity_Core_Rule_Set_Project#tab=Project_Details|OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set Project]] is ready for assessment and needs a GPC reviewer. Volunteers?
+**[[:Category:OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set Project#tab.3DProject_Details|OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set Project]] is ready for assessment and needs a GPC reviewer. Volunteers?
-** [[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?
+**[[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?
-* Releases translation process
+*Releases translation process
-** Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
+**Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
-** Define process only for docs or also tools?
+**Define process only for docs or also tools?
 ----
 *Project Reviewers,
-** In the sequence of suggestions and comments previously made by Tom and Brad and Matt, I've created a [[OWASP Project Reviewers Database|first straw of the page]] to receive information about hypothetical volunteer project reviewers.
+*Project Reviewers,
 ***Please check it out and let me know if you think any changes have to be made.
 ***Also, it seems to me that the next phases of this process could consist in pushing it forward by using this page to describe the review job role and, thereafter, by doing a call for reviewers through our leaders' mailing list.
 ***If you agree with this methodology I ask if one of you have the spare cycles to produce the above referred job description. Later on a text to support the call for reviewers will also be needed - I will produce a first draft for your comments if nobody assumes first the task.
 ----
 *GPC participation at the [http://www.ibwas.com/index.html Iberic Web Application Security] conference (IBWAS09):
 **For GPC's information, Paulo is partially using his time to assist the conference management team.
 **We need a 1h slide deck about OWASP projects to be delivered at the next AppSec Conference in Madrid.

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ** [[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?
-** Releases translation process
+* Releases translation process
-*** Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
+** Shall we handle this or let with other Committe?
-*** Define process only for docs or also tools?
+** Define process only for docs or also tools?
 ----

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 **Decisions made in DC with impact on GPC activity,
 **Has the GPC had the opportunity to contact M. Bobersky to answer his questions? [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en M. Boberski's questions]
 ----
@@ Line 15: / Line 19: @@
 ** [[:Category:OWASP_ModSecurity_Core_Rule_Set_Project#tab=Project_Details|OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set Project]] is ready for assessment and needs a GPC reviewer. Volunteers?
 ** [[:Category:OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project|OWASP Content Validation using Java Annotations Project]] is ready for assessment and needs '''TWO''' GPC reviewers as it hasn't been possible to find any volunteers within our project leaders. Volunteers?
 ----
 *Project Reviewers,
@@ Line 25: / Line 34: @@
 *GPC participation at the [http://www.ibwas.com/index.html Iberic Web Application Security] conference (IBWAS09):
 **For GPC's information, Paulo is partially using his time to assist the conference management team.
 **We need a 1h slide deck about OWASP projects to be delivered at the next AppSec Conference in Madrid.
 == From Previous Meeting/Follow up  ==

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:00, 23 November 2009
(No difference)