GPC Agenda 2009-11-02 - Revision history

Paulo Coimbra: moved GPC Agenda 2009-10-29 to GPC Agenda 2009-11-02

2009-11-02T15:25:16Z

moved GPC Agenda 2009-10-29 to GPC Agenda 2009-11-02

Paulo Coimbra: /* Current Meeting */

2009-10-29T12:04:10Z

‎Current Meeting

Paulo Coimbra at 12:00, 29 October 2009

2009-10-29T12:00:09Z

Paulo Coimbra at 11:35, 29 October 2009

2009-10-29T11:35:33Z

Paulo Coimbra: Created page with '== Previous meetings and Dial-in details == see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda '''and the Dial-In details''' = Agenda = == Current …'

2009-10-29T11:25:37Z

Created page with '== Previous meetings and Dial-in details == see GPC Meetings for previous GPC Meetings Agenda '''and the Dial-In details''' = Agenda = == Current …'

New page

== Previous meetings and Dial-in details ==
see [[:Category:GPC_Meetings|GPC Meetings]] for previous GPC Meetings Agenda '''and the Dial-In details'''

= Agenda =

== Current Meeting ==

*New Assessment Criteria
** Release Assessment
***[[:File:OWASP-ReleasesDiag Chandras-Version.png|Pravir's diagram - First stab]], [[:File:OWASP-ReleasesDiag v3.png|Pravir's diagram - Second stab]],
***[[:File:Release-Assessement Matts-Drawing.jpg|Matt's illustration]].

== From Previous Meeting/Follow up ==

*[[:Summit 2009|"OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"]]/[[:OWASP AppSec DC 2009]]:
**[https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/present/edit?id=0Ae9M2vJFBkqfZGZjOGJoY3dfMmM3cHI0OGN6&hl=en Brad's PPT].
**[[:File:AppSec DC 2009 OWASP GPC.ppt|Brad's PPT - Second version]]
***Issues (revision)we decided last meeting to add to the PPT:
****One slide about review process,
****A reviewers' drive,
****What we ask to all projects
****Maybe a PDF with all diagrams and processes/everything we have,
****What we want from our community,
****SoC,
****We should use a methodology similar to [[OWASP Working Session Top 10 2009|the one we used in the former Summit]],
****Projects committee should involve the community in determining which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....

----

*Honorary memberships to be given to "active" OWASP participants (chapter leader, project participants, etc.). Chapter and projects committees to submit proposal for persons to be given membership:
**Community's adhesion has been very limited if any - See the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]],
**It seems we haven't been clear and confused project leaders with the distinction between "contributors" and ""past_leaders_special_contributions" - Action must be taken.
** We need to add a column in the [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|"OWASP Projects Dashboard"]] to show "current" contributors.

----

*Spreading [[:Template:OWASP Project Identification Tab|OWASP Project Details Tab]] through [[OWASP Projects Dashboard|ALL OWASP Projects]].
*Waiting until we (Jason's task?) come up with revised&improved wiki code to either link project with release and to consider the below referred,
**Consider having a single release roadmap page that is not attached to a single version but instead is the summation of the various release roadmaps.
***The single page is easier for project leaders to find/edit
***The single page would show the progression of the project to external audiences
***Makes the release roadmap very similar to a changelog - which is more useful if its in one place rather then in bits attached to releases.

----

*Committee members' evaluation process.
**"GPC - Send 'Individual Committee Member' [https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=ckdDbXE0bkxPM3dkbDZvSmFNWVBGcnc6MA online form]".

= Issues for next Meeting =

*Add here

= Minutes =

*Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1
*Add here

__NOTOC__

[[Category:GPC_Meetings]]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *Honorary Membership/New template/Communication problem
-* [https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en Proposed Draft to answer M. Boberski]
+* [https://docs.google.com/a/owasp.org/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en Proposed Draft to answer M. Boberski]
 * should we address the leaders mailing list as well?

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * [[:Assessment Criteria v2.0]]/Diagrams to be discussed and sent off to the leaders mailing list
-** [[:File:OWASP-AssessmentDiag.v3.png|Global]]
+** [[:File:OWASP-AssessmentDiag.v3.png|Assessment 2.0]]
-** [[:File:OWASP-ProjectsDiag.v1.png|Assessment Criteria 2.0]]
+** [[:File:OWASP-ProjectsDiag.v1.png|Projects Assessment]]
 ** [[:File:OWASP-ReleasesDiag.v4.png|Release Assessment]]
-** Release Assessment
+*Honorary Membership/New template/Communication problem
-***[[:File:OWASP-ReleasesDiag Chandras-Version.png|Pravir's diagram - First stab]], [[:File:OWASP-ReleasesDiag v3.png|Pravir's diagram - Second stab]],
+* [https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AX4Puwz7EA41ZGNuODk2MmNfNTRjZGd0OTdkcw&hl=en Proposed Draft to answer M. Boberski]
-***[[:File:Release-Assessement Matts-Drawing.jpg|Matt's illustration]].
+* should we address the leaders mailing list as well?
 == From Previous Meeting/Follow up  ==
 *[[:Summit 2009|"OWASP Mini-Summit 2009"]]/[[:OWASP AppSec DC 2009]]:
@@ Line 30: / Line 41: @@
 ****We should use a methodology similar to [[OWASP Working Session Top 10 2009|the one we used in the former Summit]],
 ****Projects committee should involve the community in determining which projects/project leaders are supported financially. Travel, evangelism, publication, training, etc.....
 ----
@@ Line 58: / Line 53: @@
 = Minutes  =
-*Meeting started 10PM/GMT+1
+*Meeting started X PM/GMT
 *Add here

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:25, 2 November 2009
(No difference)