Jason Li at 18:28, 29 April 2009

2009-04-29T18:28:23Z

Jason Li: New page: =Minutes= (Meeting Start: 2100 GMT) * Agreed that there should be three levels to "releases": alpha, beta and "Level 3" (disagreement still exists on the name for "Level 3") * Agreed that ...

2009-04-29T18:27:46Z

New page: =Minutes= (Meeting Start: 2100 GMT) * Agreed that there should be three levels to "releases": alpha, beta and "Level 3" (disagreement still exists on the name for "Level 3") * Agreed that ...

New page

=Minutes=
(Meeting Start: 2100 GMT)
* Agreed that there should be three levels to "releases": alpha, beta and "Level 3" (disagreement still exists on the name for "Level 3")
* Agreed that there should be two levels to "projects": "Level 1" and "Level 2" (with an implicit "Level 0" for projects that have nothing produced)
* Agreed that ''entrance'' criteria into "Level 1" is at least a Beta "release".
* Postponed discussion on the ''entrance'' criteria to "Level 2" until post-SoC launch
* Left open the possibility of a "Level 3" for projects that the GPC can use to strategically steer focus/spotlight for OWASP Projects.
* Next meeting should focus on the ''exit'' criteria for SoC. Note that because SOC falls under both the OWASP Projects governance and the
OWASP Grant framework, the ''exit'' criteria for SOC does not have to be strictly based on the project criteria being established.
(Meeting Ended: 2330 GMT)

[[Category:GPC Meetings]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 =Minutes=
 (Meeting Start: 2100 GMT)
 * Agreed that there should be three levels to "releases": alpha, beta and "Level 3" (disagreement still exists on the name for "Level 3")
 * Agreed that there should be two levels to "projects": "Level 1" and "Level 2" (with an implicit "Level 0" for projects that have nothing produced)
@@ Line 6: / Line 7: @@
 * Postponed discussion on the ''entrance'' criteria to "Level 2" until post-SoC launch
 * Left open the possibility of a "Level 3" for projects that the GPC can use to strategically steer focus/spotlight for OWASP Projects.
-* Next meeting should focus on the ''exit'' criteria for SoC. Note that because SOC falls under both the OWASP Projects governance and the
+* Next meeting should focus on the ''exit'' criteria for SoC. Note that because SOC falls under both the OWASP Projects governance and the OWASP Grant framework, the ''exit'' criteria for SOC does not have to be strictly based on the project criteria being established.
 OWASP Grant framework, the ''exit'' criteria for SOC does not have to be strictly based on the project criteria being established.
 (Meeting Ended: 2330 GMT)
-[[Category:GPC Meetings]
+[[Category:GPC Meetings]]

GPC Agenda 2009-04-27 - Revision history

Jason Li at 18:28, 29 April 2009

Jason Li: New page: =Minutes= (Meeting Start: 2100 GMT) * Agreed that there should be three levels to "releases": alpha, beta and "Level 3" (disagreement still exists on the name for "Level 3") * Agreed that ...